header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 79 - 79
1 Jun 2012
Guyen O Lewallen D Cabanela M
Full Access

Introduction

Recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty remains a serious and somewhat frequent problem. Constrained implants have proven effective to manage instability. This has led to a liberal utilization of these devices. However, sporadic mechanical failures have been reported. This report analyzes the failures of a single constrained device at our institution.

Materials and Methods

Forty-three constrained implants (Stryker Constrained Linerâ„¢) in 34 patients were revised out of total 390 similar implants performed at our institution. There were 24 females and 10 males. Constrained implant was inserted at the first revision in 6 hips and after an average of three surgeries (1-6) in 37 hips. Seven different methods of constrained liner fixation were observed. Eight different theoretical failure mechanisms were identified: six are mechanical device failures at each of the implant interfaces, infection and catastrophic polyethylene wear being the other two.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 325 - 325
1 May 2006
Elorriaga-Vaquero J Sánchez-Sotelo J Hanssen A Cabanela M
Full Access

Introduction and purpose: Two-stage reimplantation of a hip replacement is the treatment of choice for deep periprosthetic infections. The purpose of this study is to analyse the survival of the femoral component in two-stage hip replacement reimplantations and compare the results of cemented and cementless components.

Materials and methods: Between 1988 and 1998 our hospital carried out 169 two-stage reimplantations for treatment of first episodes of deep infection. The femoral component was cemented in 121 cases and cementless in 48. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically for at least five years.

Results: The two-stage revision was associated with a significant clinical improvement. The reinfection rate was 9% (16/169), of which 11 patients underwent revision surgery and five received chronic suppressive antibiotic treatment. Eight patients required revision due to aseptic loosening and two for periprosthetic fracture. With the numbers available, fixation with or without cement showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: The two-stage revision of an infected hip prosthesis resolved the infection in 91% of the cases. An additional 5% required revision due to aseptic loosening. The surgical outcomes seem to be independent of the femoral component fixation (cemented or cementless).