Introduction: A new procedure has been recently adopted to implant the Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UCA). All cases are now implanted through a short incision without dislocation of the patella. The aims of this study were to assess the one-year results using this new technique and to determine if the outcome is dependent on surgical experience.

Method: The first 104 Oxford UCA’s (Phase 3) implanted by six surgeons under the care of two consultants were reviewed at one year. All operations were performed using the new technique. The average age at surgery was 68 years. All knees were scored pre-operatively and at review with the American Knee Society score. The cohort was divided into two groups; the first ten cases for each surgeon were included in a ‘learning’ group, whilst the remaining cases were included in an ‘experienced’ group.

Results: Overall the average ‘knee score’ improved from 37 points to 94 and the average ‘functional score’ from 50 points to 92. Average maximum flexion improved from 117° to 131°. The ‘knee score’ for the ‘learning’ group was 91 points. This was significantly less (p = 0.008) than the score of the ‘experienced’ group (96 points).

Conclusions: These results are significantly better than the best historical results of the Oxford (UCA), performed through an open approach with dislocation of the patella.

Despite impressive overall results at one year, lower knee scores were associated with a surgeons ‘learning curve’. After this ‘learning curve’, increased surgical experience led to further improvement with 90% achieving an excellent result, 8% a good, 2% a fair and 0% a poor result.

Introduction: In conjunction with a bilateral randomised control trial comparing the clinical outcome of two total knee arthroplasties (TKA), we carried out an in-vivo fluoroscopic analysis of both knees in the trial. Knee A, is a new mobile bearing posterior cruciate retaining TKA and Knee B, an established fixed bearing posterior cruciate retaining TKA.

Method: In an ethically approved study, video fluoroscopy was taken of both knees of seven patients performing three exercises; extension against gravity, flexion against gravity and a step up exercise. Ten images at ten-degree intervals over the flexion range were frame grabbed and digitised. The relationship of patella tendon angle (PTA) to knee flexion angle (KFA) was assessed using a newly developed computer system. Five normal knees in fit volunteers were also fluoroscoped and assessed.

Results: A similar pattern of results was obtai ed for all three exercises. Knee A behaved in a linear, more consistent fashion than Knee B, which behaved non-linearly. Analysis of variance showed this difference was significant for all three exercises (p < 0.039).

Conclusions: This bilateral study provides a powerful way of assessing the kinematics of two different knee implants. Knee A behaves in a linear predictable fashion that is nearer normal than Knee B. These results will be used in conjunction with a clinical outcome study and an RSA study to provide a complete assessment of a new TKA.

The purpose of this study was to establish the long-term clinical outcome of the Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: A continuous series of 420 patients underwent medial Oxford UKA. Indications were anteromedial osteoarthritis with full thickness lateral compartment cartilage, a functioning anterior cruciate ligament and correctable varus deformity. Survival analysis with all cause revision as the endpoint was carried out for the entire group. At the time of this study 121 were still alive at 10 years and pre/post-operative 10-year clinical data had been prospectively recorded for them from which the AKS and HSS scores were calculated. Results: Seventeen patients required revision (4%) and the fifteen year survival rate was 94.3% (95% CI 85.6 - 100%). At ten years AKS and HSS scores were: AKSS (Knee) pre 30 / post 90, AKSS (Function): pre 42/ post 69 and HSS pre 56/ post 86. The differences were statistically significant (p< 0.01).

Discussion and Conclusion: We conclude that providing careful patient selection is maintained, meniscal bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has clinical and survival results comparable to modern total knee arthroplasty. The advantages of lower morbidity and earlier return to function, enhanced by the introduction of minimally invasive techniques may make this the treatment of choice for suitable patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Introduction: The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UCA) is now routinely performed through a short incision without Dislocation of the patella. The aim of this study was to assess the one-year results of this new technique to determine whether it enhances the quality of outcome, as well as the speed of its achievement.

Method: The first 88 consecutive Oxford UCA’s (Phase 3) implanted into 75 patients by two consultant surgeons were scored pre-operatively and at review with the American Knee Society Score. The average age of the patients was 68.1 years; the male to female ratio was 0.9 to 1.

Results: At review, one patient (one knee) had died and one knee had been revised for infection. The other patients (86 knees) were examined at a mean of 1.3 years from surgery. The average ‘knee score’ improved from 37 points to 95 and the average ‘functional score’ from 51 points to 93. Average maximum flexion improved from 117° to 132°. The ‘knee score’ outcome categories at review were 87% excellent, 8% good, 2.5% fair and 2.5% poor.

Conclusions: Historical comparison of these results with the best results of the Oxford UCA, performed through an open approach with dislocation of the patella, suggest that the minimally invasive approach, in addition to faster recovery, improves the quality of outcome at one year.

Aim: This study was designed to investigate the nature and extent of tibial translation (TT) during open kinetic chain (OKC) and closed kinetic chain (CKC) activity; recent reports have suggested that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) may be strained to an equal amount during CKC and OKC exercise.

Method: Fifteen unilaterally ACL deficient (ACLD) patients and six control subjects underwent fluoroscopic assessment while performing a passive extension exercise, an OKC resisted extension exercise, and a weight-bearing CKC exercise designed to reflect knee motion experienced during dynamic daily activity. Measurements of the patella tendon angle (the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the patella tendon) were obtained to calculate relative TT.

Results: The results show that in ACL intact (ACLI) knees the CKC exercise caused greater anterior TT than the OKC exercise from 0 to 60° of knee flexion (p< 0.05). No difference between ACLI and ACLD knees was detected during the CKC exercise. Maximum weight-bearing (CKC) TT was 8±3 mm. The ACLD tibia during the OKC exercise translated more than the ACLI tibia, and to the same extent as the CKC exercise at 10 to 200 of knee flexion. The ACLI tibia during OKC exercise translated to a maximum of 3±4 mm at 1 0° knee flexion.

Summary: This study has demonstrated that fluoroscopic analysis may be used to detect differences in the kinematics of ACLI and ACLD limbs during activity. It validates recent data demonstrating that the ACL may be strained during CKC exercise to an equal or greater amount than during OKC exercise, and shows that the ACLD knee kinematics are similar to the ACLI knee during CKC exercise. Factors other than the ACL may control the extent of maximal TT during weightbearing activity. This has important consequences for the development of rehabilitation regimes after ACL reconstruction. The commonly held assumption that CKC exercise will protect an ACL graft may not be valid.

Purpose: As part of the step-wise introduction of a meniscal-bearing total knee replacement (Oxford TMK) we needed to know, before proceeding to longer term studies, whether its early clinical results were at least as good as those of an established fixed bearing device (AGC).

Material and Methods: With ethical approval, patients requiring bilateral knee replacement for osteoarthritis consented to have the operations under one anaesthetic using one of each prosthesis; to accept random choice of knee; and to remain ignorant which side was which. American Knee Society Scores, Oxford Knee Scores, ROM and pain scores were to be recorded preoperatively and at one year. By January 2001, 40 patients had reached one year and data is available for 36.

Results: Preoperatively there was no difference between the two knees. One patient died in the peri-operative period.

Results at one year (TMK first): AKSS(Knee) 91.6 / 84.1 (p=0.003), OKS 39.8 / 37.6 (p=0.006), ROM 104 / 104 (p=0.364), Pain (AKSS) 47.3 / 41.7 (p=0.01), Pain (OKS) 3.5 / 2.9 (p=0.006).

Conclusion: The TMK performed as well as the AGC. Its AKSS, OKS and pain scores were significantly better. We believe this controlled, blinded trial is the first to have compared the function of a new knee prosthesis with a standard implant before marketing; and the first to have demonstrated a significant clinical advantage for a meniscal-bearing over a fixed bearing TKR. The comparison of bilateral implants in the same patient can reveal significant differences while putting at risk many fewer subjects than would be needed for a classical twocohort RCT.

A pilot study was performed to assess the feasibility of discharging patients undergoing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) within a day of surgery; both clinical and administrative issues were examined.

Logistics and responsibilities were organised prior to the study. Representatives of anaesthetics, pain team, orthopaedics, admissions, bed management, nursing, theatres, physiotherapy, radiology and outpatients were involved. Patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis undergoing unicompartmental knee replacement who passed strict exclusion criteria were recruited. Factors included; unsuitable home situation (no phone, excessive stairs, no support person), low tolerance to NSAIDS, and not living within a 25 mile radius of the hospital. To date seven NHS patients (mean age 60 years) have been recruited. All patients underwent preoperative assessment and counselling. The mean preoperative Oxford Knee Score was 24/48, the mean Knee Society Score (KSS) was 43/100 and average pain score was 14/50 indicating all patients had significant dysfunction and pain before operation. Average knee flexion was 111° and the average flexion deformity was 5°.

Each patient had a medial UKR using the minimally invasive approach and then underwent the accelerated recovery program. The program included pain control, accelerated rehabilitation, dedicated instructions and self assessment. Post operative pain was controlled by an intra-operative infiltration of local anaesthetic around the knee and large doses of NSAIDs. All patients were mobilised on the day of surgery and all except one who was delayed for administrative reasons) were discharged the following day. Patients were discharged in an extension splint and provided with post operative instructions including an emergency back up telephone number. A designated clinician made regular contact with the patient at home to assess progress. Patients were then assessed in clinic at 6 days, 13 days, and 6 weeks after surgery.

Patients average pain scores at 7 days and 14 days were 2/10 and 2.2/10 respectively. At 6 week follow up the average knee flexion was 124° and average flexion deformity was 1°. All patients were walking independently and painfree. No complications were encountered except one patient required further manipulation for limited knee flexion.

The new pain control protocol permits early mobilisation and discharge for patients undergoing UKR. Potential benefits include increased patient comfort, functional rehabilitation, avoidance of hospital induced infection and substantial cost benefits to the NHS. The pilot study demonstrates that, provided adequate communication is maintained between involved personnel, the program is both practical and safe. It now is planned to implement the accelerated recovery program for UKR as routine.