34 two-stage revision procedures were carried out between 1989 and 1998 for controlling deep infection following resection of bone tumours and reconstruction with endoprostheses. In 4 cases the procedure failed with early recurrent infection. In six others infection reappeared after further operative procedures. Six of these ten patients required amputation. The success of the procedure in controlling infection was 75% at 5 years. Two stage revision procedures have proved effective in controlling infection in massive endoprostheses but the risk of re-infection appears to be much greater in patients requiring further surgery for any cause.

Although pathological fractures in the aged are usually due to metastasis, solitary lesions with undetected primary should be treated with caution. Assumption of such lesions as metastatic and their subsequent internal fixation could lead to completely inappropriate treatment if the lesion turns out to be a primary sarcoma of bone.

Referrals to our bone tumour service over a four year period were analysed. There were 62 pathological fractures of which 11(17. 8%) were primary sarcomas that were treated as a metastasis. The limb salvage was compromised and survival rates poor in these group.

Although it is believed that primary sarcomas are rare in the aged, our database confirms that 14% of primary sarcomas affect this age group. The survival figures of primary sarcomas in the aged (> 60 years) treated at our centre was a mean of 43 months with a 5-year survival of 22%. The presence of a pathological fracture did not significantly alter the long-term survival of these patients. On the other hand, metastasis had a poor survival with a mean of 19 months and a 5-year survival of 4% showing a significant difference. In addition, these patients underwent major inappropriate surgeries, which rendered limb-salvage difficult, worsened the morbidity and caused mental distress to patients.

Any pathological fracture in the aged presenting as a solitary osseous lesion with an undetected primary or even remote primary should be treated with caution. Their diagnosis needs to be established by biopsy whatever the age of the patient before any form of internal fixation is undertaken. The temptation to carry out biopsy and internal fixation at the same sitting or even a prophylactic fixation should be avoided when the diagnosis is not clear. Standard principles of musculoskeletal oncology need to be followed.

Local recurrence (LR) following treatment of a sarcoma is generally accepted to be a poor prognostic sign and an indicator both of inadequate local control as well as of the failure of adjuvant treatment.

Of 2589 patients with non metastatic Ewings, osteo-sarcoma, chondrosarcoma or a soft tissue sarcoma, 316 have developed LR at some stage following initial treatment of their tumour. 120 were already known to have metastases elsewhere when they developed LR or were found to have them at time of restaging but 196 developed LR as the first sign of relapse.

The mean time to development of LR was 24 months and 72% had arisen within the first two years. Overall survival following LR was 25% at 5 years and 20% at 10 yrs. In patients with metastases at the time of LR or who were found to have them at the time of restaging the median survival was 6 months with only 12% being alive at 2 years. In those with LR as first sign of relapse median survival was 3 years with 30% long term survivors. Patients with low grade tumours had a better outcome than those with high grade – 50% being cured by further surgery. Of the high grade tumours without metastases at time of diagnosis relapsed Ewing’s had the worst prognosis with median survival of 8 months compared with 22 months for osteosarcoma, 36 months for STS and 36 months for chondrosarcoma, despite which overall survival was 16% for both Ewing’s and osteo-sarcoma patients but was 30% for chondrosarcoma and STS.

LR following sarcoma surgery is due to a combination of aggressive disease with inadequate surgery and ineffective adjuvant treatment. In isolated LR aggressive further treatment is justified with an outcome similar to that of metastatic disease.