header advert
Bone & Joint Open Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Bone & Joint Open

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Bone & Joint Open at:

Loading...

Loading...

Open Access

Hip

Periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty induces histological degeneration of the gluteus medius tendon



Download PDF

Abstract

Aims

A revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a major effect on the patient’s quality of life, including walking capacity. The objective of this case control study was to investigate the histological and ultrastructural changes to the gluteus medius tendon (GMED) in patients revised due to a PJI, and to compare it with revision THAs without infection performed using the same lateral approach.

Methods

A group of eight patients revised due to a PJI with a previous lateral approach was compared with a group of 21 revised THAs without infection, performed using the same approach. The primary variables of the study were the fibril diameter, as seen in transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the total degeneration score (TDS), as seen under the light microscope. An analysis of bacteriology, classification of infection, and antibiotic treatment was also performed.

Results

Biopsy samples from the GMED from infected patients revealed a larger fibril diameter than control patients, as seen in the TEM (p < 0.001). Uninfected patients were slightly older and had their revisions performed significantly later than the infected patients. Histologically, samples from infected patients revealed significantly more vascularity (p < 0.001), the presence of glycosaminoglycans (p < 0.001), and a higher TDS (p = 0.003) than the control patients. The majority of patients had staphylococcal infections of various species.

Conclusion

More histological degeneration in the GMED was found in patients undergoing THA revision surgery due to PJI than in patients undergoing THA revision surgery due to other reasons.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):628–635.

Take home message

Periprosthetic joint infection in the hip causes histological degeneration of the gluteus medius tendon. Poor regenerative capacitity of this tendon may cause gait deficiency and poor patient reported outcomes.

This should be considered both in surgical treatment and the rehabilitation process.

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has a substantial effect on patients’ health and life, making it one of the most feared complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It has been associated with more re-admissions, subsequent revisions, poorer quality of life (QoL), and even increased mortality compared with the revision of hip prostheses for other reasons.1,2 EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) index scores indicate that patients with PJI experience a loss of independence in their lives and a greater need for ambulatory aid.2,3 Furthermore, poor postoperative results for hip function, as measured using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC),4,5 with limping and pain emphasizes the severity of this condition.6,7

Gait deficiency originating from the hip is often related to the gluteus medius tendon (GMED) and muscle infirmity.8 Tendons are dense collagenous tissues that transmit tensile forces between muscle and skeleton. They consist primarily of collagen fibres of differing quality oriented in the direction of the load. Ultrastructurally, fibers form a cluster of fibrils composed of collagen type III instead of collagen type I, resulting in tendinopathic tendons exhibiting smaller diameters.9 Proteoglycans and glycoproteins form the dense ground substance surrounding a small yet important cellular matrix including tenocytes. Disorganized fibre arrangement, increased non-cellular ground substance, poor vascularity, and an increase in glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) constitute degenerated tendons, in addition to fatty deposits and ectopic ossifications, which can be studied in the microscope. However, the pathogenesis and repair mechanisms are only understood to a limited degree, although the importance of mechanical tendon loading, in particular regarding the Achilles and supraspinatus tendons, has been recognized.10,11

THA is performed using different surgical approaches, with the lateral and the posterior approaches being the most common.12 Large registry studies,13,14 as well as histological and ultrastructural studies of THA patients,15 have revealed differences between the outcome and tendon appearance of the different approaches. A recent study of infected patients has also shown that the lateral approach was associated with inferior postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) when used in a single debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR) procedure compared with the posterior approach.16

The objective of this case control study was to investigate the histological and ultrastructural appearance of the GMED in a group of eight patients revised due to a PJI, who had their primary THA operated via a lateral approach, and compare it with a group of 21 revised THAs without infection performed using the same approach.

The hypothesis was that more ultrastructural and histological tendon degeneration would be found in infected patients than in non-infected patients undergoing THA revision surgery. The primary variables of the study were the fibril diameter, as seen in the transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the total degeneration score (TDS), as seen in the light microscope.

Methods

Originally, patients undergoing surgery at our institution (orthopaedic department, Uddevalla Hospital, NU Hospital Group, Sweden) between 2015 and 2018 were recruited to a case control study with the aim of studying histological and ultrastructural changes in the GMED tendon in patients with primary THA due to osteoarthritis (OA), cervical neck fracture, or revision THA, where the index operations had been performed using a lateral or posterior approach.15 The exclusion criteria in the revision group were previous non-implant hip surgery and neuromuscular diseases (polio, stroke, multiple sclerosis). In addition, patients with multiple illnesses, including insulin-requiring diabetes, dementia, widespread malignancy, and systemic corticosteroid treatment, as well as previous surgery due to PJI, were excluded.

Nevertheless, a revised subgroup of eight patients had suffered PJI and undergone index surgery using a lateral approach. In the revision group, 21 of the non-infected patients had undergone index surgery through the same lateral approach. In these patients, samples for both the light and electron microscope were suitable and were analyzed according to methods previously used at our institution.15 All patients gave their written informed consent prior to their study inclusion, and had prospectively been asked to complete self-assessment forms for a EuroQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) report and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) prior to revision surgery. Ethical approval for the study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee at the medical faculty at the University of Gothenburg Dnr 381/15.

Ultrastructural analysis

Specimens were collected at surgery by cutting 5 to 7 mm pieces with a surgical knife and immediately fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 0.1 M sucrose and 3 mM CaCl2 (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 30 minutes, followed by storage at 4 °C. The specimens were rinsed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) prior to post-fixation in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 2 h. The specimens were then dehydrated stepwise in ethanol, followed by acetone and LX-112 (Ladd) embedding. Ultrathin sections (approximately 60 to 80 nm) were prepared and contrasted with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate and examined in a Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN electron microscope (FEI) operated at 80 kV and equipped with a 2kx2k Veleta CCD camera (Olympus Soft Imaging System, USA). Four randomly acquired images in areas showing transversely sectioned collagen fibrils were used for image analysis and fibril diameter measurement. The fibril diameters were measured manually on images acquired at x49.000 magnification (1.14 nm/px) using Fiji software17 and the Bio-Formats plugin.

In all, 100 fibrils were analyzed in each specimen and the mean value was calculated with an accuracy of 1/10th of a nanometre. Two biopsy specimens from each patient were scanned. However, the fibril diameters were only measured in the biopsy with the best transverse orientation, while the other biopsy was left unmeasured. The micrographs were evaluated by an independent technician (LH) with extensive experience of using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The technician was not informed of the group affiliation of the specimens.

Histological analysis

The samples for light microscopy were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin blocks and sectioned at 4 to 5 μm. The sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin (HE) to evaluate the fibre structure, cellularity and vascularity. Alcian blue (pH 2.5)-periodic acid Schiff (AB/PAS) was used to detect GAG-rich areas. The histological evaluations of two samples from each patient were performed by a pathologist (NP) and an orthopaedic surgeon (TM) with a special interest in pathology, together using a light microscope (Leica DMRBE, Germany). The examiners were blinded in terms of the group to which the patient belonged.

The fibre structure, cellularity, and vascularity and the presence of GAGs were classified according to a semi-quantitative scoring system (Table I).15,18 It consists of four different elements, each of which is between 0 and 3 points. This procedure and evaluation system have also been used in multiple previous studies.19-23

Table I.

Evaluation of biopsy samples with a semi-quantitative four-point scoring system.

Sample Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3
Fibre structure Straight, parallel, packed fibres, with slight waviness Slight separation of fibres, increased waviness Separation of fibres, deterioration of fibres Complete loss of fibre structure and hyalinisation
Cellularity < 100 cells/high-power field (HPF) 100 to 199 cells/HPF 200 to 299 cells/HPF > 300 cells/HPF
Vascularity Vessels running parallel to the collagen fibre bundles in the septa Slight increase in vessels, including transverse vessels in the tendon tissue Moderate increase in vessels within the tendon tissue Markedly increased vascularity with clusters of vessels
Glycosaminoglycans No alcianophilia Slight alcianophilia between the collagen fibres Moderate increase in alcianophilia Markedly increased alcianophilia forming blue lakes
  1. HPF, high-power field.

The TDS was therefore calculated by adding the values from the two biopsies for the four constituents, which can result in values between 0 (no degeneration) and 12 points (extremely high degeneration). The TDS is similar to a scoring concept previously described and used in a biopsy analysis of the Achilles tendon. The score has also undergone satisfactory intraobserver reliability testing.24

Bacteriological analysis

Analyses of bacteriology, the definition of infection and antibiotic treatment, were performed by a specialist in infectious diseases (JK) in accordance with previously published data from the same institution.25 A PJI was reckoned by the major criterium of two or more positive cultures with growth of the same microbiological organism in joint fluid or collected tissue samples. In the non-infected group, PJI was ruled out by ten collected tissue samples at revision surgery. A PJI was considered to be eradicated when there were no inflammatory signs, including normalized ESR and/or CRP or symptoms from the hip joint for a minimum of two years after the termination of antibiotic treatment.26

Statistical analysis

Median (range) and mean (standard deviation (SD)) values are presented for the clinical data and the TEM findings. For the histological findings, a stratified distribution is presented. The unpaired t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparisons of clinical data, fibril diameters, and the histological findings of the TDS, respectively, between the study groups.

The power analysis was based on the assumption that it would be meaningful to detect a difference of 5 nm in fibril diameter between the study groups in accordance with previously published studies. If the SD was as large as 40 nm, then 800 fibrils from infected patients and 2,100 control fibrils would reach a power of over 80%. The value of α used in the power analysis was 0.05.

Results

Background clinical and outcome data in the infected and the non-infected revision groups are presented in Table II. The non-infected patients had their revisions performed significantly later after the index operation than the infected patients.

Table II.

Comparison of clinical data and self-reported patient outcome measurements.

Variable Infected patients (n = 8) Non-infected patients (n = 21) p-value
Sex, n 0.408
Male 6 11
Female 2 10
Age, yrs 0.119
Mean (SD) 67 (9.1) 73 (10.8)
Median (range) 66 (52 to 80) 74 (46 to 90)
BMI, kg/m 2 0.327
Mean (SD) 28 (4.9) 30 (5.7)
Median (range) 27.4 (20 to 37) 28.3 (24 to 45)
Preoperative EQ-5D-3L score 0.881
Mean (SD) 0.46 (0.31) 0.41 (0.31)
Median (range) 0.69 (0.09 to 0.8) 0.55 (-0.18 to 0.8)
Missing values 1 2
Preoperative Oxford Hip Score 0.728
Mean (SD) 19 (11.4) 21 (7.7)
Median (range) 20 (3 to 40) 21 (9 to 44)
Years from index operation 0.004
Mean (SD) 3.6 (4.5) 11.6 (6.7)
Median (range) 1.7 (0.2 to 14) 11.1 (1 to 23)
  1. Significant p-values are marked in bold.

  1. EQ-5D-3L, EuroQol five-dimension three-level; SD, standard deviation.

The biopsy samples from the GMED of infected patients revealed a significantly larger diameter than those of the control patients, as seen in the TEM (p < 0.001) (Table III). However, the relative fibril distribution was similar.

Table III.

Fibril diameter as seen in the transmission electron microscope.

GMED tendon fibrils Infected patients (n = 8) Non-infected patients (n = 21) p-value*
N 800 2,100
Mean diameter, nm (SD) 62.7 (17.0) 56.1 (15.5) < 0.001
Median, nm (range) 60.0 (30 to 170) 59.0 (18 to 150)
  1. n = the number of fibrils in areas showing transversely sectioned collagen fibrils; p-value is significant.

  1. *

    Unpaired t-test.

  1. GMED, gluteus medius tendon; SD, standard deviation.

Representative TEM images showing both the fibril diameter and the composition of fibrils in transversely sectioned tendons are presented in Figure 1.

Fig. 1 
          a) Tendon from a standard revision due to loosening eight years postoperatively in a 73-year-old female patient. b) Tendon from an infected 52-year-old male patient with an infection duration of one year. The images appear to have similar fibril diameter distribution, with slightly more ECM between the fibrils in the infected image to the right. Scale bars 1 µm.

Fig. 1

a) Tendon from a standard revision due to loosening eight years postoperatively in a 73-year-old female patient. b) Tendon from an infected 52-year-old male patient with an infection duration of one year. The images appear to have similar fibril diameter distribution, with slightly more ECM between the fibrils in the infected image to the right. Scale bars 1 µm.

The distribution of the histological findings for the four elements of the TDS is reported in Table IV. Histologically, the samples from infected patients revealed significantly more vascularity (p < 0.001), presence of GAGs (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test), and a higher TDS (p = 0.003, Mann-Whitney U test) than the samples from control patients (Table V).

Table IV.

Stratified distribution of biopsy samples pursuant to the semi-quantitative four-point scoring system.

Variable Infected patients (n = 8 × 2) Non-infected patients (n = 21 × 2)
Fibre structure 0 1 (6) 1 (2)
1 4 (25) 12 (29)
2 11 (69) 20 (48)
3 8 (19)
Cellularity 0 2 (13) 4 (10)
1 5 (31) 21 (50)
2 1 (6) 10 (24)
3 8 (50) 6 (14)
Vascularity 0 11 (26)
1 3 (19) 18 (43)
2 4 (25) 10 (24)
3 9 (56) 2 (5)
Glucosaminoglycans 0 15 (36)
1 2 (13) 14 (33)
2 11 (69) 5 (12)
3 3 (19) 7 (17)
Missing values, % 1 (2)
  1. Two samples were collected from each patient. The total number for each score is listed as whole numbers and percentages are given in parentheses.

Table V.

Histological results of biopsy sample system.

Variable Revision infection (n = 8 × 2) Revision lateral (n = 21 × 2) p-value*
Fibre structure 0.360
Mean (SD) 1.6 (0.62) 1.9 (0.76)
Median (range) 2.0 (0 to 2) 2.0 (0 to 3)
Missing values 1
Cellularity 0.119
Mean (SD) 1.9 (1.18) 1.4 (0.87)
Median (range) 2.5 (0 to 3) 1.0 (0 to 3)
Missing values 1
Vascularity < 0.001
Mean (SD) 2.4 (0.81) 1.1 (0.85)
Median (range) 3.0 (1 to 3) 1.0 (0 to 3)
Missing values 1
Glucosaminoglycans
Mean (SD) 2.1 (0.57) 1.1 (1.091) < 0.001
Median (range) 2.0 (1 to 3) 1.0 (0 to 3)
Missing values 1
TDS 0.003
Mean (SD) 8.0 (2.71) 5.5 (2.49)
Median (range) 8.5 (3 to 11) 5.0 (1 to 10)
Missing values 1
  1. Significant p-values are in bold.

  1. *

    Mann-Whitney U test.

  1. SD, standard deviation; TDS, total degeneration score.

Photomicroscopic views of biopsy specimens obtained from repair tissue of the gluteus medius tendon are presented in Figure 2. Views a and c are stained with haematoxylin and eosin, with b and d with Alcian blue-PAS, and all the views have a magnification of approximately x 50. Loss of fibre structure, increased vascularity, and pronounced blue staining indicates degeneration.

Fig. 2 
          Biopsy specimens a) and b) were obtained at revision from a 78-year-old male patient with a periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty performed using a lateral approach. a) depicts the deterioration of fibres, with several vessels within the dense connective tissue. b) Rich glycosaminoglycan content with markedly increased alcianophilia in the connective tissue. Biopsy specimens c) and d) were obtained at revision from a 77-year-old male patient with cup and stem loosening, who had previously undergone a hip joint arthroplasty via a lateral approach. The light-microscopic views show c) slight separation of fibres and few vessels. d) A moderate increase in alcianophilia (blue staining) between the pink-stained collagen fibres.

Fig. 2

Biopsy specimens a) and b) were obtained at revision from a 78-year-old male patient with a periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty performed using a lateral approach. a) depicts the deterioration of fibres, with several vessels within the dense connective tissue. b) Rich glycosaminoglycan content with markedly increased alcianophilia in the connective tissue. Biopsy specimens c) and d) were obtained at revision from a 77-year-old male patient with cup and stem loosening, who had previously undergone a hip joint arthroplasty via a lateral approach. The light-microscopic views show c) slight separation of fibres and few vessels. d) A moderate increase in alcianophilia (blue staining) between the pink-stained collagen fibres.

Bacteriological findings, surgical treatment, subsequent antibiotic therapy, and the outcome of the treatment of the infection are listed in Table VI. The majority of patients had staphylococcal infections of various species. Patient number six differed from the others since he had had a temporary implant prior to revision. Intravenous antibiotics were given for an average of ten days and were followed by oral therapy for just over three months.

Table VI.

Clinical and bacteriological data in infected patients.

No. Sex Age, yrs Time from index op

(years)
Primary pathogen Secondary pathogens Surgical treatment Intravenous therapy Oral therapy Outcome
1. Male 70 0.7 CoNS One-stage revision Vancomycin Ciprofloxacin/rifampicin Eradication
2. Male 59 0.3 Staphylococcus saccharolyticus One-stage revision Piperacillin-tazobactam Clindamycin/penicillin V Eradication
3. Female 80 6.4 Escherichia coli One-stage revision Cefotaxime Ciprofloxacin Eradication
4. Male 78 3.9 CoNS Two-stage revision Vancomycin Clindamycin/rifampicin Lifelong antibiotic suppression

(flucloxacillin)
5. Male 58 14.2 Cutibacterium acnes Staphylococcus aureus, CoNS One-stage revision Vancomycin Clindamycin/amoxicillin Eradication
6. Male 72 0.2 S. aureus One-stage revision Cloxacillin Flucloxacillin Eradication
7. Female 64 2.4 S. aureus DAIR + cup revision Vancomycin Sulphametoxazol/trimethoprim Lifelong antibiotic suppression

(Sulpha-Trimethoprim)
8. Male 52 1.0 S. saccharolyticus One-stage revision Vancomycin Clindamycin Eradication
  1. CoNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococci; DAIR, debridement, antibiotics and implant retention.

Discussion

The main finding in the present study was that more histological degeneration was found in the GMED tendon in patients undergoing THA revision surgery due to a PJI than in patients undergoing THA revision surgery for other reasons.

GMED tendon changes among patients with a PJI appear to be particularly associated with the vascularization and changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM). GAG are complex carbohydrates in the ECM that are thought to form cross-links between collagen molecules, and play a role in the mechanical properties of tendons. A correlation between an abnormal Achilles tendon fibre structure with tendinosis and a substantial histopathological increase in the volume of GAG-rich areas was presented decades ago,24 and the excess amounts of GAGs in the present study indicate more tendinosis and thereby degeneration.

The formation of the ECM and the pathophysiology of GAGs have recently attracted increasing interest in cellular research. Although the normal mechanical function depends on the precise alignment of collagen fibrils, it is proteoglycans that regulate collagen fibrillogenesis and thus, indirectly, tendon function.27 GAG depletion in tendons increases fascicle stress relaxation, but not recovery.28 Certain GAG formation, as well as GAG-depleted tendons, affect tenocyte morphology and nanostructural properties, and facilitate both load transfer and sliding between fibrils.29 Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research are also able to produce constructs by using bioreactors on stem and progenitor cell populations that will improve tendon repair. However, in spite of being needed for seamless tendon function, an increasing amount of GAGs indicates tendon degeneration.30

Ultrastructurally, the group of infected patients had more collagen fibrils with a larger diameter than the uninfected group, which is inconsistent with our hypothesis. However, the difference is not striking, and the diameter in both groups is smaller than in non-infected patients previously undergoing surgery through a posterior approach and considerably less than in patients with OA and cervical hip fracture.15 Both groups in the present study had previously undergone surgery using the lateral approach, thereby cutting the insertion of the GMED tendon. This procedure itself might induce a shift towards smaller fibril diameters. The assumption that a difference of 5 nm in fibril diameter may also have been too small and created a type II error.

Normal ageing, as well as a prolonged period of symptoms, might also produce a reduction in tendon fibril diameter and symptoms. The uninfected patients were slightly older than the infected ones, which is regarded as unfavourable in terms of tendon degeneration.31 Further, the time from the index operation was significantly longer among the uninfected patients, which may also influence the results.

Previously presented poor PROM results after THA revisions due to infection are supported by the histological results in the present study.2,3 Tendons have very little regenerative capacity of their own, and there is no scientific evidence of regeneration to normal tendon tissue.32 Bacteria may stimulate inflammation by inducing the tenocytes to fibroblast activation, which can cause subsequent fibrosis.33 The material in the present study is too sparse to enable an analysis of whether certain bacteria are more disadvantageous in terms of tendon degeneration. Only one patient in the present study had a significant polymicrobial infection. This has been shown to correlate with inferior treatment outcomes due to bacteriological synergy,34 but the effect on tendon degeneration is unknown. Regarding the effect of different bacteria and other toxic agents, the complicated molecular mechanisms and interactions of inflammation and tendon regeneration require further study.35

PJIs are a challenge to the orthopaedic society. Progress regarding bacteriological culturing and antibiotic treatment, together with close co-operation between specialized arthroplasty surgeons and specialists in infectious diseases, has been prosperous. The present study demonstrates a connection between PJIs and tendon degeneration. It is known that tendon repair results in the formation of a fibrovascular scar that never attains the gross, histological, or mechanical characteristics of a normal tendon.32

A further understanding of the mechanisms of regeneration may promote adjuvant medical treatment and tailored physiotherapy. However, it appears that a previous lateral approach.16 Repeated revisions and two-stage procedures are also disadvantageous to patient rehabilitation.36

One major limitation of this study is the small number of infected patients, putting it at risk of being underpowered. In addition, it was not known how long the infection had been active. The occurrence and duration of nutritional and endocrine diseases were not exhibited. Even if the patients did not have medical treatment, hyperglycaemia and hypothyroidism may have existed, and possibly affected tendon tissue and collagen fibrils. Furthermore, no PROM assessments were made over time, and no follow-up of the histological and ultrastructural appearance was obtained.

Taken together, biopsies from living patients in a clinical context with an infected THA present a histological GMED tendon degeneration. The poor regenerative capacity of tendons may explain the inferior results in PROMs regarding hip function seen in other studies of patients with a previous PJI.2 This may induce falls or fear of falling, which is a well-established cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly people.37,38

In conclusion, more histological degeneration in the GMED was found in patients undergoing THA revision surgery due to PJI than in patients undergoing THA revision surgery for other reasons.


Correspondence should be sent to Urban Hedlundh. E-mail:

References

1. Gundtoft PH , Pedersen AB , Varnum C , Overgaard S . Increased mortality after prosthetic joint infection in primary THA . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2017 ; 475 ( 11 ): 2623 2631 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

2. Wildeman P , Rolfson O , Söderquist B , Wretenberg P , Lindgren V . What are the long-term outcomes of mortality, quality of life, and hip function after prosthetic joint infection of the hip? A 10-year follow-up from Sweden . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2021 ; 479 ( 10 ): 2203 2213 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

3. Poulsen NR , Mechlenburg I , Søballe K , Lange J . Patient-reported quality of life and hip function after 2-stage revision of chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection: a cross-sectional study . Hip Int . 2018 ; 28 ( 4 ): 407 414 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

4. Heath EL , Ackerman IN , Cashman K , Lorimer M , Graves SE , Harris IA. . Patient-reported outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a large national registry . Bone Jt Open . 2021 ; 2 ( 6 ): 422 - 32 . Google Scholar

5. Yeo MGH , Goh GS , Chen JY , Lo NN , Yeo SJ , Liow MHL . Are oxford hip score and western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index useful predictors of clinical meaningful improvement and satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty . 2020 ; 35 ( 9 ): 2458 2464 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

6. Halawi MJ , Jongbloed W , Baron S , Savoy L , Williams VJ , Cote MP . Patient dissatisfaction after primary total joint arthroplasty: the patient perspective . J Arthroplasty . 2019 ; 34 ( 6 ): 1093 1096 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

7. Tang H , Du H , Tang Q , Yang D , Shao H , Zhou Y . Chinese patients’ satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty: what is important and dissatisfactory? J Arthroplasty . 2014 ; 29 ( 12 ): 2245 2250 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

8. Zügner R , Hjelmberg N , Rolfson O , Strömberg C , Saari T . Gluteus maximus transfer following total hip arthroplasty does not improve abductor moment: a case-control gait analysis study of 15 patients with gluteus medius disruption . J Clin Med . 2022 ; 11 ( 11 ): 11 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

9. Pingel J , Lu Y , Starborg T , et al. 3-D ultrastructure and collagen composition of healthy and overloaded human tendon: evidence of tenocyte and matrix buckling . J Anat . 2014 ; 224 ( 5 ): 548 555 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

10. Benjamin M , Kaiser E , Milz S . Structure-function relationships in tendons: a review . J Anat . 2008 ; 212 ( 3 ): 211 228 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

11. Durgam S , Stewart M . Cellular and molecular factors influencing tendon repair . Tissue Eng Part B Rev . 2017 ; 23 ( 4 ): 307 317 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

12. Chechik O , Khashan M , Lador R , Salai M , Amar E . Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2013 ; 133 ( 11 ): 1595 1600 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

13. Kristensen TB , Vinje T , Havelin LI , Engesæter LB , Gjertsen JE . Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture . Acta Orthop . 2017 ; 88 ( 1 ): 29 34 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

14. Lindgren JV , Wretenberg P , Kärrholm J , Garellick G , Rolfson O . Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish hip arthroplasty register including 42,233 patients . Bone Joint J . 2014 ; 96-B ( 5 ): 590 596 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

15. Ibrahim M , Hedlundh U , Sernert N , et al. Histological and ultrastructural degenerative findings in the gluteus medius tendon after hip arthroplasty . J Orthop Surg Res . 2021 ; 16 ( 1 ): 339 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

16. Pollmann CT , Gjertsen JE , Dale H , Straume-Næsheim TM , Dybvik E , Hallan G . Operative approach influences functional outcome after DAIR for infected total hip arthroplasty . The Bone & Joint Journal . 2020 ; 102-B ( 12 ): 1662 1669 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

17. No authors listed . ImageJ . https://imagej.net/ImageJ ( date last accessed 19 July 2023 ). Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

18. Ibrahim M , Kartus JT , Steigen SE , Olsen R , Meknas K . Correction to: more tendon degeneration in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2019 ; 27 ( 1 ): 276 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

19. Kartus J , Movin T , Papadogiannakis N , Christensen LR , Lindahl S , Karlsson J . A radiographic and histologic evaluation of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central third . Am J Sports Med . 2000 ; 28 ( 2 ): 218 226 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

20. Meknas K , Johansen O , Steigen SE , Olsen R , Jørgensen L , Kartus J . Could tendinosis be involved in osteoarthritis? Scand J Med Sci Sports . 2012 ; 22 ( 5 ): 627 634 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

21. Svensson M , Kartus J , Christensen LR , Movin T , Papadogiannakis N , Karlsson J . A long-term serial histological evaluation of the patellar tendon in humans after harvesting its central third . Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 2005 ; 13 ( 5 ): 398 404 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

22. Svensson M , Movin T , Rostgård-Christensen L , Blomén E , Hultenby K , Kartus J . Ultrastructural collagen fibril alterations in the patellar tendon 6 years after harvesting its central third . Am J Sports Med . 2007 ; 35 ( 2 ): 301 306 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

23. Åhlén M , Lidén M , Movin T , Papadogiannakis N , Rostgård-Christensen L , Kartus J . Histological evaluation of regenerated semitendinosus tendon a minimum of 6 years after harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction . Orthop J Sports Med . 2014 ; 2 ( 9 ): 2325967114550274 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

24. Movin T , Gad A , Reinholt FP , Rolf C . Tendon pathology in long-standing achillodynia: biopsy findings in 40 patients . Acta Orthop Scand . 1997 ; 68 ( 2 ): 170 175 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

25. Hedlundh U , Zacharatos M , Magnusson J , Gottlander M , Karlsson J . Periprosthetic hip infections in a Swedish regional hospital between 2012 and 2018: is there a relationship between cutibacterium acnes infections and uncemented prostheses? J Bone Jt Infect . 2021 ; 6 ( 6 ): 219 228 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

26. Sendi P , Lötscher PO , Kessler B , Graber P , Zimmerli W , Clauss M . Debridement and implant retention in the management of hip periprosthetic joint infection: outcomes following guided and rapid treatment at a single centre . Bone Joint J . 2017 ; 99-B ( 3 ): 330 336 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

27. Yoon JH , Halper J. . Tendon proteoglycans: biochemistry and function . J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact . 2005 ; 5 ( 1 ): 22 - 34 . PubMed Google Scholar

28. Legerlotz K , Riley GP , Screen HRC . GAG depletion increases the stress-relaxation response of tendon fascicles, but does not influence recovery . Acta Biomater . 2013 ; 9 ( 6 ): 6860 6866 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

29. Al Makhzoomi AK , Kirk TB , Dye DE , Allison GT . Contribution of glycosaminoglycans to the structural and mechanical properties of tendons - a multiscale study . J Biomech . 2021 ; 128 : 110796 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

30. Dyment NA , Barrett JG , Awad HA , Bautista CA , Banes AJ , Butler DL . A brief history of tendon and ligament bioreactors: impact and future prospects . J Orthop Res . 2020 ; 38 ( 11 ): 2318 2330 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

31. Thomopoulos S , Parks WC , Rifkin DB , Derwin KA . Mechanisms of tendon injury and repair . J Orthop Res . 2015 ; 33 ( 6 ): 832 839 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

32. Galatz LM , Gerstenfeld L , Heber-Katz E , Rodeo SA . Tendon regeneration and scar formation: the concept of scarless healing . J Orthop Res . 2015 ; 33 ( 6 ): 823 831 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

33. Dakin SG , Newton J , Martinez FO , et al. Chronic inflammation is a feature of achilles tendinopathy and rupture . Br J Sports Med . 2018 ; 52 ( 6 ): 359 367 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

34. Leonard HAC , Liddle AD , Burke O , Murray DW , Pandit H . Single- or two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature . Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2014 ; 472 ( 3 ): 1036 1042 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

35. Yang Y , Wu Y , Zhou K , et al. Interplay of forces and the immune response for functional tendon regeneration . Front Cell Dev Biol . 2021 ; 9 : 657621 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

36. Poulsen NR , Mechlenburg I , Søballe K , Troelsen A , Lange J , Coriha Research Group . Improved patient-reported quality of life and hip function after cementless 1-stage revision of chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection . J Arthroplasty . 2019 ; 34 ( 11 ): 2763 2769 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

37. Cuevas-Trisan R . Balance problems and fall risks in the elderly . Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am . 2017 ; 28 ( 4 ): 727 737 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

38. Gazibara T , Kurtagic I , Kisic-Tepavcevic D , et al. Falls, risk factors and fear of falling among persons older than 65 years of age . Psychogeriatrics . 2017 ; 17 ( 4 ): 215 223 . Crossref PubMed Google Scholar

Author contributions

U. Hedlundh: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

J. Karlsson: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

N. Sernert: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

L. Haag: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing.

T. Movin: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing.

N. Papadogiannakis: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing.

J. Kartus: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding statement

The author(s) received no financial or material support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ICMJE COI statement

U. Hedlundh and J. Kartus declare support for this manuscript from Western Sweden Country Council (ALF Agreement (ALFGBG-673881). In addition, U. Hedlundh reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Urban Hedlundh and Zimmer Biomet Europe, which are unrelated. J. Karlsson reports support for this manuscript from Department of Research and Development, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden, and Department of Research and Development, Vänersborg, Sweden. J-T. Kartus declares consulting fees, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events, from ConMed Sweden; support for attending meetings and/or travel from NU Hospital Group; and stock or stock options from Novalent, all of which is also unrelated to this work.

Data sharing

The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are not publicly available due to data protection regulations. Access to data is limited to the researchers who have obtained permission for data processing. Further inquiries can be made to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Leyla Roshani, Biomedical Laboratory Scientist, for her help with handling and transportation of all specimens.

Ethical review statement

Ethical approval for this study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty at the University of Gothenburg Dnr 381/15. All patients gave their written informed consent prior to their study inclusion.

Open access funding

The authors report that they received open access funding for this manuscript from University of Gothenburg, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.

© 2023 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/