header advert
Bone & Joint 360 Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Bone & Joint 360

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Bone & Joint 360 at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Roundup

Children’s orthopaedics


X-ref For other Roundups in this issue that cross-reference with Children’s orthopaedics see: Spine Roundup 7; Oncology Roundup 3.

Anterior cruciate ligament in the paediatric population

X-ref

In a very topical paper given the recent Rio Olympiad, with many talented young athletes starting their training in an increasingly competitive atmosphere at a very young age (the youngest competitor, Nepalese Gaurike Singh, is just 13 years old), the injuries sustained are also becoming more akin to those of the adult population. Noting that there is an increase in reports of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries within the paediatric population, investigators from Charlottesville, Virginia (USA) have undertaken a review of a nationwide billing database to identify the numbers of patients presenting with and undergoing ACL reconstruction.1 The authors identified patients over a four-year period and report the outcomes of over 44 000 unique paediatric ACL injuries. Of these, just over 19 000 underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, and there was a definite preponderance of meniscal reconstruction when compared with the adult population. The authors analysed the national database to characterise the recent epidemiological trends of ACL injuries and reconstruction in the paediatric and adolescent populations. They found a significant increase in the overall diagnosis of ACL injury and ACL reconstruction in both paediatric and adolescent patients. Those patients who underwent ACL reconstruction had significant increases in incidence of concomitant meniscal and cartilage procedures. The main message of this study is that the profile of the paediatric ACL injury is changing, with increasing numbers of injuries identified, and increasing at a rate that is well above that of the adult population. As sport becomes progressively more competitive and professional from a very early stage, it is clear that adult pattern injuries are also going to become a greater burden to paediatric orthopaedic surgeons.

The paediatric pelvis

X-ref

Despite the rarity of paediatric pelvic injuries, we have recently seen a small flurry of papers in the scientific literature. This is particularly welcome given that this is an injury that could do with having some light shone upon it. These authors from Bochum (Germany) have set about answering one of the biggest unanswered questions in paediatric trauma surgery: how do paediatric pelvic fractures fare in the longer term?2 To answer this question the authors collated their series of 33 patients, all with paediatric pelvic ring injuries. The patients were treated at a single-level one centre and represented the full spectrum of injuries with ages ranging between four and 16 years. On average, patients were followed for over two years and handled according to local protocols. Stable injuries (n = 17) were treated non-operatively for the most part, and unstable injuries (n = 15) were treated operatively where possible. Even in stable injuries there was appreciable residual clinical deformity in just over 40% of stable patients managed non-operatively, with an ischial height difference of over 5 mm. Symptomatically, 10% of children experienced a clinically relevant leg-length discrepancy and the majority of patients presented with unstable pelvic injuries and ongoing lower back pain throughout the two years of follow-up. The authors of this study concluded that in paediatric patients with pelvic ring injuries, radiographic deformity persisted and did not remodel. This is a unique and important finding. In addition, as perhaps might be expected, the complex displaced injuries have higher rates of operative intervention, residual deformity, and low back and sacroiliac joint pain.

Hip surgery in the non-ambulant cerebral palsy child

X-ref

Nearly all paediatric orthopaedic surgeons would agree that there is a significant place for hip reconstructive surgery even in the non-ambulant cerebral palsy (CP) child. That is just about where the agreement ends; the indications, interventions and expectations of results are all different between treating clinicians and institutions, and it is very difficult to research this group of patients. Surgeons from Boston, Massachusetts (USA) report a prospective cohort study of 38 consecutive non-ambulant CP patients (Gross Motor Function Classification System IV/V), all of whom underwent surgery for hip dysplasia.3 The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between radiological markers of hip subluxation (migration percentage/acetabular index) and health-related quality of life (Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD)) score before and after reconstructive hip surgery. Clinical and radiological assessment immediately before surgery, at six weeks and regular follow-up intervals to two years after the surgery all demonstrated an improvement in the CPCHILD score which correlated with an improvement in migration index. The migration percentage and CPCHILD score were inversely related in the pre-operative period and this relationship continued throughout the follow-up period with a 0.2 point increase of CPCHILD for each 1% correction in migration percentage. Management of hip subluxation in this patient group presents considerable ethical challenges. There is a paucity of evidence and decisions are generally made on the basis of the assumption that a significant proportion of these patients will eventually develop pain, and that even if they cannot express it in a conventional manner it will impact on quality of life for both child and carer. This study clearly suggests an improvement in health-related quality of life that can be predicted by the extent of surgical correction. There are however some important practical issues inherent in studying this patient population such as the imprecise scoring system in patients without verbal communication, in addition to methodological deficiencies including absence of a control group and short follow-up. This paper provides some objective justification for surgical reconstruction and would be of general interest to surgeons in paediatric practice.

Bracing of early hip dislocation

The management of early hip dislocation is almost exclusively conservative (in the first instance at least). However, the majority of papers to support the use of a brace in particular are single centre or small retrospective series. We were delighted here at 360 to see the publication of this paper reporting a multicentre, prospective cohort study of brace use in the treatment of infant hip dislocation. The authors aimed to quantify the success rate and identify variables associated with brace failure. This study from seven institutions across North America, Europe and Australia was managed using REDCap (research electronic data capture) tools (REDCap; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee). The authors defined a successful treatment as obtaining and maintaining reduction of the hip following bracing with no subsequent surgical intervention.4 Bracing overall was a success in 162 of 204 (79%) dislocated hips. Variables associated with a significant risk of failure include femoral nerve palsy during brace treatment; treatment with a static brace; an initially irreducible hip; treatment initiated after the age of seven weeks; right hip dislocation; and Graf type IV hip. Hips with no risk factors had just a 3% probability of failure while more than four risk factors resulted in a 100% probability of failure. This study confirms conventional wisdom associated with this condition, but does so with the first prospective, multicentre study and level I evidence. It identifies risk factors associated with failure and quantifies that risk, informing decision-making for medical staff and parents and is therefore of great interest to paediatric orthopaedic surgeons.

Will head perfusion measurements help in Dunn osteotomy?

The holy grail of paediatric surgery is perhaps the successful management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE). This is probably one of the most challenging conditions in any branch of orthopaedic surgery with a variety of presentations, difficult to achieve surgical reduction and high-stakes complications. It is the complications that are devastating; few conditions can be as life-altering as avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head in a child. This study from Aurora, Colorado (USA) assessed the accuracy of AVN prediction following the Dunn osteotomy for SUFE – if head perfusion measurements can indeed predict issues with death of the femoral head, then this could be used to aid intra-operative decision-making.5 The study reports the outcomes of 29 modified Dunn procedures, all performed for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Assessment was made of epiphyseal perfusion before dissection of the retinacular flap, and after fixation by the presence of observed active bleeding and/or intracranial pressure monitoring. In this series, avascular necrosis developed in seven patients (26%) after a minimum follow-up of one year, assessed by plain radiographs. The assessment of femoral head perfusion by either method was effective in identifying patients who subsequently then developed AVN. The study size, however, was insufficient to identify clinical factors predictive of osteonecrosis. Perhaps it is not surprising that a total lack of blood flow before dissection and after fixation, as assessed using clinical observation or instrumented pressure measurement, was highly indicative of AVN. However, the authors demonstrate that AVN is identifiable at the time of index surgery and this is of great interest to paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Like many similar studies, it is relatively easy to pick holes in this small study. Nonetheless, we feel at 360 that it has a lot to offer. Among the many limitations is the retrospective nature of this analysis, coupled with an early change in methodology and the small numbers in the series. What this study really offers is the raising of an interesting question.

Pavlik harness not always successful

The Pavlik harness is the saviour of many children’s hips. Designed to allow for gradual reduction, easy to apply and with usually excellent results, it has saved thousands of children from open reduction of the hip. However, it isn’t always successful; predictors of failure are of particular interest, as knowing when to intervene and not allow conservative treatment to continue if doomed to failure is clearly part of the art of current paediatric hip surgery. Paediatric surgeons, again in Aurora, Colorado (USA) have added to what is already known on this important topic with their retrospective study of 150 patients who underwent the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using the Pavlik harness at a mean age of 30 days (4-155 days).6 Follow-up was for a minimum of two months, and 90% were followed for a minimum of six months. In this series, Pavlik treatment failed in 27% (21 of 78 cases) of Ortolani positive hips, 5% (3 of 60 cases) of Barlow positive hips and 8% (6 of 77 cases) of hips with dysplasia. After controlling for potential confounding variables, male sex (OR 6.9; 95% CI 2.0 – 24.2; p = 0.002) and Graf type IV (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.3 – 15.4; p = 0.019) were identified as independent predictors of failure. In short, male infants with Graf type IV hips have a higher risk of Pavlik harness treatment failure. This paper adds detail to what is already known on the topic, with the addition of the male sex as a risk factor.

Tibial eminence fractures: arthroscopic or open?

X-ref

Despite the flurry of papers concerning true anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures in the paediatric knee, the signature ligament injury in the paediatric population is the tibial eminence fracture or ACL footprint avulsion. Due to the viscoelastic nature of paediatric ligament, it usually has a higher ultimate tensile stress under most loading conditions than the bone into which it fits, thus avulsion fractures are more common in children. The range of treatment options for tibial eminence avulsion tends to nudge towards operative interventions, as the increasing use of MRI scanning suggests that there are few truly undisplaced fractures. Some are advocates of arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF), arguing that this reduces the incidence of subsequent arthrofibrosis, while others are proponents of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), arguing that superior reduction and fixation offsets any potential issues with surgical insult. Surgeons in Auckland (New Zealand) set out to establish which chain of thought was correct with their rather small study of 13 patients undergoing ORIF, and 18 patients undergoing ARIF.7 On the surface, the two groups appeared to be demographically similar with no real differences in sex, age, fracture type or fixation mode. However, the ARIF group waited significantly longer for their surgery, had longer tourniquet times, and the arthrofibrosis rate was significantly higher (n = 6 of 18 vs 1 of 15). For reasons that escape the statistical boffins at 360 HQ, the authors undertook a multivariant analysis and claim that the key to success is early, quick surgery and that ARIF itself may actually be a confounder. It is almost impossible to reliably make that sort of conclusion with a small group and multiple factors; however it certainly seems that if patients do require fixation of a tibial eminence fracture, in these patients at least, the use of open surgery is more reliable.

References

1 Werner BC , YangS, LooneyAM, GwathmeyFWJr. Trends in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. J Pediatr Orthop2016;36:447-452.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

2 Kruppa CG , KhoraityJD, SietsemaDL, et al.. Pediatric pelvic ring injuries: How benign are they?Injury2016 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27451290.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

3 DiFazio R , ShoreB, VesseyJA, MillerPE, SnyderBD. Effect of hip reconstructive surgery on health-related quality of life of non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2016;98-A:1190-1198.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

4 Upasani VV , BomarJD, MatheneyTH, et al.. Evaluation of brace treatment for infant hip dislocation in a prospective cohort: defining the success rate and variables associated with failure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2016;98-A:1215-1221.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

5 Novais EN , SinkEL, KestelLA, et al.. Is assessment of femoral head perfusion during modified Dunn for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis an accurate indicator of osteonecrosis?Clin Orthop Relat Res2016;474:1837-1844.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

6 Novais EN , KestelLA, CarryPM, MeyersML. Higher Pavlik harness treatment failure is seen in Graf type IV Ortolani-positive hips in males. Clin Orthop Relat Res2016;474:1847-1854.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

7 Watts CD , LarsonAN, MilbrandtTA. Open versus arthroscopic reduction for tibial eminence fracture fixation in children. J Pediatr Orthop2016;36:437-439.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar