header advert
Bone & Joint 360 Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Bone & Joint 360

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Bone & Joint 360 at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Medico-legal issues in the foot and ankle specialty



Download PDF

Like all subspecialty areas within orthopaedic surgery, foot and ankle work carries risks, complications and the potential for litigation. Certain areas of this work have been highlighted for this article to aid the surgeon in appropriately counselling the patient, and improving understanding of major risk areas and knowledge of the outcomes of injury and surgery.

Foot and ankle litigation claims

Historically, information on litigation claims has been difficult to acquire because it involves obtaining information from a number of different bodies. There is no mechanism for compulsory reporting of complications, coding accuracy is usually found wanting, and most claims are either dismissed or settled without going to court. However, in 2014, Ring1 provided an analysis of 1214 National Health Service Litigation Authority (NHSLA) claims in England, involving foot and ankle surgery, over 17 years. These represented 12.6% of orthopaedic claims. Thirty-four per cent of claims involved the ankle, with 73% resulting from trauma. Twenty-one per cent involved the first ray, of which 98% involved elective surgery. Nineteen per cent of claims involved diagnostic errors, 19% were for alleged incompetent surgery, and a further 13% for mismanagement. The authors recognised that reducing incorrect, delayed and missed diagnoses was a key area for improvement.

Medico-legal implications:

  • One in 8 orthopaedic claims involve the foot and ankle.

  • Only one in 5 claims arise from incompetent surgery allegations.

  • The importance of reaching a correct and timely diagnosis with a cogent management plan cannot be over-emphasised.

Nerve injury

Nerve injury is a common foot and ankle surgical complication, with the most frequent causes being inadvertent laceration, entrapment under metalwork, contusion/soft-tissue swelling and accidental injury from suture needle placement. This may result in diminished sensation, painful neuroma formation, adverse effects on mobility and problems with footwear. The sural, superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, saphenous and tibial nerves can all be injured.

Bai2 reported a 6% nerve injury rate following ankle surgery, involving sural, superficial peroneal and medial plantar nerve injury. Ferkel3 reported that 49% of complications following ankle arthroscopy were neurological.

The sural nerve is particularly at risk in Achilles tendon surgery, hindfoot posterolateral approaches and incisions of the lateral aspect of the foot. Paavola4 reported a nerve injury rate of 0.9% in surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. Kirkley5 recorded a 6.0% rate in surgical repair of Achilles ruptures, although Lim6 described a 10.5% incidence of sural nerve region paraesthesia prior to Achilles rupture surgery. Similar to axillary nerve injury in shoulder dislocations, it would be helpful to document nerve health prior to intervention. Ribbans’ review7 reported an 11% injury rate in the open posterolateral approach for posterior ankle impingement syndrome. Injury during open reduction of calcaneal fractures has been reported in numerous publications, with rates as high as 55% described.8

The superficial peroneal nerve is at risk in fixation of fibular fractures, ankle ligament reconstruction and ankle arthroscopy. Redfern9 reported a 15% incidence of superficial peroneal nerve injury following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures. This could be reduced by making a more posterolateral incision. Deng10 reported a 3.5% incidence, and Ferkel3 a 2.4% incidence, of nerve injury following ankle arthroscopy.

Medico-legal implications:

  • Nerve injuries are a common potential complication of foot and ankle surgery and procedures should be planned with nerve anatomy in mind.

  • Patients should be counselled pre-operatively about nerve injury and specific nerve risks according to the planned procedure.

Complex regional pain syndrome

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a relatively rare but well-recognised complication following trauma and elective surgery to the foot and ankle.

Foot and ankle trauma is the most likely outcome with contusions, sprains, crush injuries, and fractures, including prolonged immobilisation. One small series 11 found that trauma was the most common cause (73%), of which fractures accounted for 45%. The other 27% were secondary to elective foot surgery, with neuroma excision the most common procedure. A low threshold of suspicion is required and a rapid referral to a multidisciplinary unit most likely to yield optimal outcomes.12,13 The combined incidence of CRPS following open reduction for calcaneal fractures using a variety of approaches was 7% in 139 cases.14-16

A Scottish retrospective study17 found an incidence of 4.4% in 390 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. The condition appeared to have a particular predilection for middle-aged females and those with a pre-existing history of anxiety and depression. The authors felt that such patients should be counselled pre-operatively regarding such a potential complication.

Medico-legal implications:

  • With an overall risk of 1 in 23 patients, CRPS should reasonably be added to any developed patient information leaflets and consenting process.

Thromboembolic issues

While the use of anti-thrombotic prophylaxis in major hip and knee surgery is well-established, its use in foot and ankle surgery remains a contentious issue.

Griffiths18 reported upon 2627 elective foot and ankle procedures over a seven-year period, of whom 41% had aspirin and 59% no prophylaxis. There was no apparent protective effect of aspirin and the overall incidence of DVTs was 0.27%, and pulmonary emboli of 0.15% at three months. The authors concluded that the risk of clinically significant thromboembolic events in elective foot and ankle surgery was low, and chemoprophylaxis should be confined to high-risk groups for VTE. Hamilton19 reported upon a postal questionnaire to UK foot and ankle surgeons who between them undertook 33 500 elective cases per annum. The reported perceived incidence of DVTs was 0.6%, PEs 0.1%, and fatal PEs of 0.02%. Solis20 reported an ultrasound incidence of DVTs of 3.5% in 201 elective patients with no clinical symptoms of a thromboembolic event.

The incidence of thromboembolic events following trauma may be greater than elective surgery. Most work has centred on tendo Achillis ruptures. Patel21 retrospectively reported an incidence of 0.43% for DVTs and 0.32% for PEs. Nilsson-Helander22 reported colour duplex sonography findings of DVTs in 34% and PEs in 3% of 95 acute ruptures, with no difference between non-surgical and surgical patients.

Medico-legal implications:

  • BOFAS guidelines23 published in 2010 considered most elective foot and ankle procedures as low-risk for a thromboembolic event.

  • The decision to place patients on chemical thromboprophylaxis should be based upon patient-specific factors.

Infection in foot and ankle surgery

Infection is an ever-present risk in surgery. A major prospective survey of 1737 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery described an overall 14.5% wound healing and/or infection rate – 11.6% had minor wound problems; 2.4% required antibiotics to control a post-operative infection; and 0.5% required re-admission for intravenous antibiotics and/or surgery.24 A retrospective review of 1000 patients25 undergoing foot and ankle surgery reported an overall infection rate of 4.8% but diabetic patients had a rate of 13.2% compared with non-diabetics, whose incidence was 2.8%. Further analysis demonstrated that patients with complicated diabetes, such as neuropathy, had a tenfold increased infection risk compared with non-diabetics.

Medico-legal implications:

  • Up to one in seven elective foot and ankle procedures can result in wound healing problems and/or infection.

  • Diabetic patients, especially those with neuropathy, have a significantly increased risk of post-operative infection.

Injecting around the foot and ankle

Various soft-tissue and articular injections for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes are widely used in foot and ankle practice. However, the administration of such injections is not without hazard. Local complications can include skin atrophy, hypopigmentation, increased pain, steroid flare, and infection. Systemic effects can occur including skin rash, flushing and menstrual irregularities. Rarer complications including osteomyelitis have been described. A review of extra-articular steroid injections in general reported a risk of major adverse effects ranging from between 0% and 5.8%, and of minor events ranging between 0% and 81%.26 Hunter27 reported an approximate rate of septic arthritis following an intra-articular injection of steroids as 1:10 000.

Within the foot and ankle, the following should be particularly acknowledged:

  • Atrophy of the plantar fat pad from injections for plantar fasciitis and Morton’s neuroma.

  • Rupture of the plantar plate following injections to the lesser MTP joints or inter-metatarsal space.

  • Rupture of the plantar fascia following injections for plantar fasciitis – reported to be as high as 10%.28

  • Counsel patients carefully pre-injection and acquaint them with potential complications.

Total ankle arthroplasty surgery

The UK National Joint Registry has only been acquiring data about total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) since 2010. As a result, the long-term survivorship of TAAs nationally is not as well-progressed as it is for hips and knees, particularly when the relatively low number of procedures performed is taken into account.

In 2014, 509 primary TAAs were recorded in the UK29 compared with 83 125 knee, 95 850 hip, and 4756 shoulder replacements.

Survivorship of specific TAAs has been reported. For example, Barg30 reported 94% and 84% survivorship for the Hintegra TAA at five and ten years, respectively. For the STAR TAR, five-year survivorship has been reported at 89% to 90%31,32 and 71% to 76% at ten years.31,33 The Swedish Registry recommended patients be advised that, using modern designs of TAAs, the probability of implant survival is around 80%.34 With the limited data available, the NJR estimates that the four-year cumulative revision risk for a TAA (2010-2014) was 3.28%.

Haddad35 undertook a systematic review of the literature, establishing and comparing the intermediate and long-term outcomes of TAA and ankle fusion (Table I). The analysis revealed similar results in both procedures for end-stage ankle arthritis:

Table I.

Haddad et al. (2007):35 outcomes of TAA and ankle fusion

TAA Ankle fusion
Patients 852 1262
Results:
 Excellent 38.0% 31%
 Good 30.5% 37%
 Fair 5.5% 13%
 Poor 24.0% 13%
Survivorship (TAA only):
 5 years 78%
 10 years 77%
Revision surgery 7% 9%

Medico-legal implications:

  • Compared with hip and knee arthroplasty surgery, TAA is still undertaken in relatively small numbers.

  • A reasonable estimate of TAA implant survival at ten years is about 80%.

  • In experienced hands, TAA outcomes can rival those of ankle fusion.

Misdiagnosis of acute tendo Achillis rupture

Acute ruptures of the tendo Achillis can present to a variety of healthcare professionals. Frequently the patient does not appreciate the significance of the injury. The diagnosis is missed in up to 25% of patients on initial assessment36-39 but rises higher in the elderly, with a 36% misdiagnosis in the over-65-year-old group. This is felt to be due to both reduced patient awareness and lowered clinical suspicion.40

Medico-legal implications:

  • A careful clinical assessment and, if necessary, a confirmatory ultrasound or MRI is important in patients of all ages presenting with suspicious Achilles injuries.

Lateral ankle ligament sprains

A considerable amount of literature is available on the epidemiology of lateral ankle ligament sprains.41,42 In the UK, it is estimated that approximately 1.8 million ankle sprains occur annually but only 300 000 present in emergency departments. Fourteen per cent of injuries are regarded as severe, and the risk of re-injury within three years is regarded as 34% in the general population and 73% in athletes. There are variable estimates of patients making a full recovery within three years ranging between 36% and 85%.

Medico-legal implications:

  • Ankle sprains are among the most common conditions presenting to emergency departments.

  • However, they are not always benign injuries, with a sizeable proportion experiencing re-injury and prolonged and incomplete recoveries.

Commonly missed foot and ankle fractures

From the many fractures witnessed within the foot and ankle, several have a particular reputation for being commonly missed on initial presentation, including:

Calcaneal body fractures

This injury, which has a reputation for poor outcomes, is missed in up to 10% of cases.43

Anterior process of the calcaneum fractures

This fracture represents 15% of all calcaneal fractures but is commonly misdiagnosed as an ankle sprain.44 Up to 25% of these fractures can remain symptomatic for up to 12 months after injury despite apparent radiographic union.45 Nonunions may require excision.

Lateral process of the talus (LPT) fractures

With the increasing popularity of snowboarding, the incidence of LPT fractures has increased in recent years. These injuries are now commonly referred to as ‘snowboarder’s fracture’ and are believed to be caused by an external rotation or eversion stress placed on an axial loaded dorsiflexed ankle,46 with between 33% and 41% being missed on initial presentation.44

Lisfranc injuries

Injuries to the Lisfranc midfoot complex can range from severe displaced fracture-dislocations to subtle ligamentous injuries. However, long-term deformity and disability is common, particularly if the diagnosis is delayed which occurs in 20% to 40% of cases.47

Medico-legal implications:

  • Overall, 7.6% of foot fractures and 2.8% of ankle fractures were missed in the emergency department,48 with several specific fractures commonly misdiagnosed.


e-mail:

References

1. Ring J , TalbotCL, CloughTM. Clinical negligence in foot and ankle surgery. A 17-year review of claims to the NHS Litigation Authority. Bone Joint J2014;96-B:1510-1514. Google Scholar

2. Bai L , HanY-N, ZhangW-T, HuangW, ZhangH-L. Natural history of sensory nerve recovery after cutaneous nerve injury following foot and ankle surgery. Neural Regen Res2015;10: 99103.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

3. Ferkel RD , HeathDD, GuhlJF. Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy1996;12:200-208.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

4. Paavola M , OravaS, LeppilahtiJ, KannusP, JarvinenM. Chronic Achilles tendon overuse injury: complications after surgical treatment. An analysis of 432 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med2000;28:77-82.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

5. Kirkley A , LoIKY, NorweilerB, KumbhaneDA. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative review. Clin J Sport Med1997;7:207-211.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

6. Lim J , DalaiR, WaseemM. Percutaneous vs open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon – a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Int2001:22;559-568. Google Scholar

7. Ribbans WJ , RibbansHA, CruickshankJA, WoodEV. The management of posterior ankle impingement syndrome in sport: a review. Foot Ankle Surg2015;21:1-10.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

8. Eastwood D , AtkinsRM. Lateral approaches to the heel: a comparison of two incisions for the fixation of calcaneal fractures. Foot1992;2:143-147. Google Scholar

9. Redfern DJ , SauvePS, SakellariouA. Investigation of incidence of superficial peroneal nerve injury following ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int2003;24:771774.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

10. Deng DF , HamiltonGA, LeeM, et al.. Complications associated with foot and ankle arthroscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg2012;51:281-284.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

11. Anderson DJ , FallatLM. Complex regional pain syndrome of the lower extremity: a retrospective study of 33 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg1999;38:381-387.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

12. Nambi-Joseph P , Stanton-HicksM, SferraJJ. Interventional modalities in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Foot Ankle Clin N Am2004;9:405-417.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

13. Shah A , KirchnerJS. Complex regional pain syndrome. Foot Ankle Clin N Am2011;16:351-356.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

14. Chan S , IpFK. Open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the os calcis. Injury1995;26:111-115.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

15. Wiley WB , NorbergJD, KlonkCJ, AlexanderIJ. “Smile” incision: an approach for open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int2005;26:590-592. Google Scholar

16. Weber M , LehmannO, SägesserD, KrauseF. Limited open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2008;90-B:1608-1616.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

17. Rewhorn MJ , LeungAH, GillespieA, MoirJS, MillerR. Incidence of complex regional pain syndrome after foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg2014;53:256-258.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

18. Griffiths JT , MatthewsL, PearceCJ, CalderJT. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in elective foot and ankle surgery with and without aspirin prophylaxis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2012;94-B:210-214.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

19. Hamilton PD , HariharanK, RobinsonAHN. Thromboprophylaxis in elective foot and ankle patients – current practice in the United Kingdom. Foot Ankle Surg2011;17:89-93. Google Scholar

20. Solis G , SaxbyT. Incidence of DVT following surgery of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int2002;23:411-414.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

21. Patel A , OgawaB, CharltonT, ThordarsonD. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after Achilles tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res2012;470:270-274.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

22. Nilsson-Helander K , ThurinA, KarlssonJ, ErikssonBI. High incidence of deep venous thrombosis after Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2009;17:1234-1238.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

23. No authors listed. Current British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society position statement on VTE prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery, 20April2010. www.bofas.org.uk (date last accessed 16 December 2015). Google Scholar

24. Williams MT , MolloyAP, SimmondsDJ, ButcherCK. Infection rates in foot and ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2012;94-B(Suppl XXII):28. Google Scholar

25. Wukich DK , LoweryNJ, McMillenRL, FrykbergRG. Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2010;92-A:287-295.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

26. Brinks A , KoesBW, VolkersAC, VerhaarJA, Bierma-ZeinstraSM. Adverse effects of extra-articular corticosteroid injections: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2010;11:206.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

27. Hunter JA , BlythTH. A risk-benefit analysis of intra-articular corticosteroids in rheumatic disorders. Drug Saf1999; 21:353-365. Google Scholar

28. Acevedo JI , BeskinJL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int1998;19:91-97.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

29. No authors listed. National Joint Registry 12th annual report 2015. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/12th%20annual%20report/NJR%20Online%20Annual%20Report%202015.pdf (date last accessed 16 December 2015). Google Scholar

30. Barg A , ZwickyL, KnuppM, HenningerHB, HintermannB. HINTEGRA total ankle replacement: survivorship analysis in 684 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2013;95-A:1175-1183.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

31. Fevang BT , LieSa, HavelinLI, et al.. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between 1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop2007;78:575-583.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

32. Karantana A , HobsonS, DharS. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res2010;468:951957.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

33. Brunner S , BargA, KnuppM, et al.. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: long-term, eleven to fifteen-year, survivorship analysis of the prosthesis in seventy-two consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2013; 95-A:711-718.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

34. Henricson A , NilssonJ-A, CarlssonA. 10-year survival of total ankle arthroplasties. A report on 780 cases from the Swedish Ankle Register. Acta Orthop2011; 82:655659. Google Scholar

35. Haddad SL , CoetzeeJC, EstokR, et al.. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2007;89-A:1899-1905.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

36. Arner O , LindholmA. Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon; a study of 92 cases. Acta Chir Scand Suppl1959;116(Suppl 239):1-51. Google Scholar

37. Nillius S , NilssonB, WestlinN. The incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand1976;47:118-121.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

38. Inglis AE , ScottWN, SculcoTP, et al.. Ruptures of the tendo Achilles. An objective assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]1976;58-A:990-993. Google Scholar

39. Ballas MT , TytkoJ, MannarinoF. Commonly missed orthopedic problems. Am Fam Phys1998;57:267-274.PubMed Google Scholar

40. Nestorson J , MovinT, MöllerM, KarlssonJ. Function after Achilles tendon rupture in the elderly: 25 patients older than 65 years followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop Scand2000;71:64-68.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

41. Bridgman SA , ClementD, DowningA, et al.. Population based epidemiology of ankle sprains attending accident and emergency units in the West Midlands of England, and a survey of UK practice for severe ankle sprains. Emerg Med J2003;20:508-510.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

42. van Rijn RM , van OsAG, BernsenRMD, et al.. What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? A systematic literature review. Am J Med2008;121:324-331.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

43. Freed HA , ShieldsNN. Most frequently overlooked radiographically apparent fractures in a teaching hospital emergency department. Ann Emerg Med1984;13:900-904.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

44. Judd DB , KimDH. Foot fractures frequently misdiagnosed as ankle sprains. Am Fam Physician2002;66:785-794.PubMed Google Scholar

45. Degan TJ , MorreyBF, BraunDP. Surgical excision for anterior-process fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]1982;64-A:519-524.PubMed Google Scholar

46. Valderrabano V , PerrenT, RyfC, RillmannP, HintermannB. Snowboarder’s talus fracture. Treatment outcome of 20 cases after 3.5 years. Am J Sports Med2005;33:871-880. Google Scholar

47. Goossens M , De StoopN. Lisfranc’s fracture-dislocations: etiology, radiology and results of treatment. A review of 20 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res1983;176:154-162. Google Scholar

48. Wei CJ , TsaiWC, TiuCM, et al.. Systematic analysis of missed extremity fractures in emergency radiology. Acta Radiol2006;47:710-717.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar