Abstract
Objectives
The objective of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) treated with quality and quantity control culture (QQ-culture) to expand and fortify angiogenic cells on the acceleration of fracture healing.
Methods
Human PBMNCs were cultured for seven days with the QQ-culture method using a serum-free medium containing five specific cytokines and growth factors. The QQ-cultured PBMNCs (QQMNCs) obtained were counted and characterised by flow cytometry and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Angiogenic and osteo-inductive potentials were evaluated using tube formation assays and co-culture with mesenchymal stem cells with osteo-inductive medium in vitro. In order to evaluate the therapeutic potential of QQMNCs, cells were transplanted into an immunodeficient rat femur nonunion model. The rats were randomised into three groups: control; PBMNCs; and QQMNCs. The fracture healing was evaluated radiographically and histologically.
Results
The total number of PBMNCs was decreased after QQ-culture, however, the number of CD34+ and CD206+ cells were found to have increased as assessed by flow cytometry analysis. In addition, gene expression of angiogenic factors was upregulated in QQMNCs. In the animal model, the rate of bone union was higher in the QQMNC group than in the other groups. Radiographic scores and bone volume were significantly associated with the enhancement of angiogenesis in the QQMNC group.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated that QQMNCs have superior potential to accelerate fracture healing compared with PBMNCs. The QQMNCs could be a promising option for fracture nonunion.
Cite this article: K. Mifuji, M. Ishikawa, N. Kamei, R. Tanaka, K. Arita, H. Mizuno, T. Asahara, N. Adachi, M. Ochi. Angiogenic conditioning of peripheral blood mononuclear cells promotes fracture healing. Bone Joint Res 2017;6: 489–498. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0338.R1.
Article focus
-
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with the quality and quantity culture method are a potential cell candidate for clinical application in cases of bone nonunion.
-
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells have no serious ethical or technical problems associated with their use, in contrast to human embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells, or mesenchymal stem cells.
-
Angiogenic conditioning culture of PBMNCs enhances the radiological and histological repair of bone fractures.
Key messages
-
The angiogenic and osteogenic potential of PBMNCs could be amplified by ex vivo conditioning culture.
-
QQMNCs accelerate bone fracture healing.
Strengths and limitations
-
Strengths: This is the first study to demonstrate the potential use of PBMNCs cultured with a special medium for fracture healing as a more feasible and promising cell candidate in the clinical setting.
-
Limitations: We used a small number of animals to evaluate fracture healing and we did not compare other cell fractions such as mesenchymal stem cells, CD34+ cells or bone marrow CD34+ cells.
Introduction
Fractures may fail to heal for a variety of reasons, including both mechanical and biological factors. A key mechanical factor is stability of the fracture site, while reduced osteogenic potential and loss of vascularity are important biological factors leading to nonunion.1-3 Standard treatment involves autologous bone grafting, but graft harvesting is associated with morbidity while graft supply is limited, and grafts have unpredictable reparative potential.4
The cell therapy approach has been adopted to augment the effectiveness of biological factors. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) and CD34+ cells have all been proposed as cell candidates.5-7 In particular, CD34+ cells (the cell fraction containing endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs)) are used for cell-based angiogenic therapy, and their therapeutic effect on fracture healing was demonstrated in preclinical and clinical studies.7,8 Thus, CD34+ cells have been shown to have a potential for acceleration of bone healing by improving angiogenesis. However, CD34+ cell therapy has limitations. First, the number of these cells is limited, comprising < 0.01% of the cells in peripheral blood and 0.1% in bone marrow.9 Second, ageing or disease attenuates the therapeutic potential of the cells.10 Third, to obtain this cell fraction, invasive procedures are required such as apheresis and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).8 To overcome these problems, Masuda et al10 developed a serum-free culture system with added cytokines and growth factors to increase the angiogenic cell fraction using stem cell factor (SCF), thrombopoietin (TPO), Flt-3 ligand, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). With the use of this culture method, CD34+ cells can be expanded while maintaining their CD34 positivity and increasing their angiogenic potential. Based on these effects, this approach was named ‘quality and quantity culture’ (QQ-culture).11 To minimise the invasiveness and cost of the cell isolation procedure, this QQ-culture method was applied to PBMNCs. A preclinical study demonstrated that this approach upregulated the cells’ angiogenic and anti-inflammatory potentials, and showed that cultured cells had greater therapeutic effect in a mouse hind limb ischaemia model.12 Based on these preliminary results, we hypothesised that human PBMNCs treated by the QQ-culture method (QQMNCs) could be favourable candidates for fracture healing.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the angiogenic and osteogenic potential of QQMNCs, and to investigate whether QQMNCs accelerate fracture healing in a femoral fracture nonunion model in immunodeficient rats.
Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the institutional animal committee of Hiroshima University (A14-52). All animals were treated according to the guidelines stipulated by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Quality and quantity culture
Samples of human peripheral blood (20 mL) were collected from healthy volunteers, and PBMNCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Lymphocyte Separation Solution (LSM) (d = 1.077, Histopaque-1077 sterile-filtered; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri), as previously reported.8 Informed consent was obtained from all volunteers. Isolated PBMNCs were treated by the QQ-culture method for seven days without any change of medium at a density of 2 × 106 cells/2 mL/well in six-well culture plates (BD Biosciences, #353846, Primaria, BD Falcon, San Jose, California). The complete QQ-culture medium was prepared using serum-free medium (Stem Line; Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with human stem cell factor (SCF) (#130-096-692, concentration 100 ng/mL; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), human thrombopoietin (TPO) (#130-094-011, concentration 20 ng/Ml; Miltenyi Biotec), human Fms-related tyrosin kinase (Flt)-3 ligand (#130-096-474, concentration 100 ng/Ml; Miltenyi Biotec), human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (#100-20, concentration 50 ng/mL; Peprotech EC Ltd, London, United Kingdom), and human interleukin (IL)-6 (#130-095-365, concentration 20 ng/mL; Miltenyi Biotec). Cell density in QQ culture corresponded to approximately 1 × 106 PBMNCs in 1 mL as previously reported (Supplementary Fig. a).12,13 After culture, QQMNCs were counted and used for further analysis as described below.
Cell characterisation by flow cytometry
To characterise PBMNCs and QQMNCs (n = 6 per group), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed using a BD LSRFortessa Cell Analyzer (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences) after staining with mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies against the following surface markers: Cluster of Differentiation (CD)34-Brilliant Violet (BV) 421 (clone 581; BD Biosciences); Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor(VEGFR)2-Phycoerythrin(PE) (clone 7D4-6; BioLegend, San Diego, California); Cluster of Differentiation (CD206)-fluorescein(FITC) (clone 15-2; BioLegend); and C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2)- Brilliant Violet (BV)605 (clone K036C2; BioLegend). Dead cells were excluded on the basis of 7-Amino-Actinomycin D (7-AAD) staining (BD Biosciences). Cells were stained with monoclonal antibodies for 20 minutes at 4°C following Fc receptors (FcR) blocking, washed twice using Hank’s buffered salt solution containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and then analysed. Relevant isotype controls (Immunoglobulin G(IgG)1-BV421 isotype control (BD Biosciences), IgG1-PE (BD Biosciences), IgG1-FITC (BD Biosciences), and IgG2a-BV605 (BioLegend)) were also used. In all samples, 20 000 events were acquired.
Cell characterisation by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts), total RNA was extracted from PBMNCs or QQMNCs (n = 6 per group). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesised using 10 ng total RNA with the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). A real-time PCR assay was performed using TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). Relative expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt values and results are expressed as 2-ΔΔCt. The value of each control sample was set at one and was used to calculate the fold difference in each target gene. All primers and probes used are listed in Table I.
Table I.
Type | |||
---|---|---|---|
Human probes | Angiogenic | VEGFA | Hs 00900055_m1 |
angiopoetin1 | Hs 00375822_m1 | ||
angiopoetin2 | Hs00169867_m1 | ||
Osteogenic | RUNX2 | Hs 00231692_m1 | |
Type1 collagen | Hs 00164004_m1 | ||
osteocalcin | Hs 01587814_g1 | ||
Internal control | GAPDH | Hs 02758991_g1 | |
Rat probes | Angiogenic | VEGF | Rn 0511601_m1 |
FGF2 | Rn 00570809_m1 | ||
Osteogenic | RUNX2 | Rn 01512298_m1 | |
Type1 collagen | Rn 01463848_m1 | ||
osteocalcin | Rn 00566386_g1 | ||
Internal control | GAPDH | Rn 01749022_g1 |
-
VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; RUNX2, Runt-related
-
transcription factor 2; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; FGF2, fibroblast growth factor 2
Tube formation assay
PBMNCs and QQMNCs were evaluated by tube formation assay by co-culturing with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) on ECMatrix gel (Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) to confirm their angiogenic potential. To solidify the matrix solution, 150 µL was incubated at 37°C for one hour in a 96-well plate. Then 1 × 103 cells from each group (PBMNCs, QQMNCs) were mixed with 1.5 × 104 HUVECs in 50 µL of Endothelial Basal Medium -2 (EBM-2) complete medium containing 2% FBS, seeded onto the surface of the polymerised ECMatrix and co-cultured. As a control, HUVECs were cultured alone. After incubation for 12 hours, photomicrographs of each well were taken under a light microscope (IX71N-22FL/PH; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and then the length of tube formation was calculated using ImageJ Software version 1.48 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) (n = 16 in each group four donors, repeated four times ).
Osteogenic induction of MSCs in vitro
Commercially available primary human bone marrow MSCs (BMMSCs) from healthy donors (Lonza Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) were cultured and expanded in a specific medium, mesenchymal stem cell growth medium (MSCGM Bulletkit; Lonza Ltd). MSCs at passage four were seeded into 12-well plates with an initial seeding density of 10 000 cells/cm2 and preconditioned in osteogenic induction medium (StemPro Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C for one day. After preconditioning, the MSCs were co-cultured with PBMNCs or QQMNCs (1 × 105 cells, n = 12 in each group; three donors, repeated four times) using cell culture inserts (Falcon Cell Culture Inserts: For Use With 12-Well Plates#353180 ) for seven days. As a control, MSCs alone were cultured in osteogenic induction medium. Total RNA was extracted from the MSCs at days 3 and 7 of co-culture using TRIzol, and cDNA was synthesised. A real-time PCR assay was performed in the same manner as described above. All primers and probes used in this analysis are listed in Table I. For evaluation of calcium deposition, the MSCs were stained with Alizarin Red S (CAS No. 130-22-3; Sigma-Aldrich) at day 14 of co-culture, and the stained area was measured using ImageJ Software.
Animal study
Animals and surgical procedure
Male athymic nude rats (F344/NJcl-rnu/rnu, nine to ten weeks old, (CLEA Japan, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) were used to evaluate the therapeutic potential of QQMNCs in vivo. All surgical procedures were performed under normal sterile conditions. The rats were anaesthetised using ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (12 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal administration. A transverse femoral fracture was created in the right femur of each rat and nonunion was induced by cauterising the periosteum to a distance of 2 mm on each side of the fracture, as previously described.14,15 In order to avoid significant displacement of the fracture and achieve well-aligned stability, a 1.2 mm diameter Kirschner wire was inserted from the trochlear groove into the femoral canal in a retrograde manner. Finally, the wound was tightly closed in layers. Rats were then randomised to three groups: control; PBMNC; and QQMNC. In the PBMNC and QQMNC groups, 2 × 105 cells were injected into the site immediately after surgery while the control group received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) alone.
Evaluation of fracture healing
Rats were anaesthetised before imaging. Serial radiographs were taken at zero, two, four, six and eight weeks after surgery, and fracture healing was evaluated by Qui’s radiographic scoring system (n = 8 in each group and at each time point).16
For micro-CT imaging (µCT), rats were killed at two, four and eight weeks, and the right femurs were harvested. The femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd, Osaka, Japan) at 4°C for 24 hours, wires were removed, and µCT images were acquired (SkyScan 1176; Bruker, Kontich, Belgium). The imaging settings were as follows: acceleration voltage: 40 kV; beam current: 800 µA, no filter; resolution: 18 μm; and rotation: 360° in 1° steps. Acquired images were reconstructed using the manufacturer’s software (NRecon version 1.6.4.1; Skyscan), and total callus volume (TV), mineralised bone volume (BV), and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were analysed on either side, 2 mm away from the fracture site using a CT Analyzer, version 1.11.8.0 (Skyscan) (two weeks: n = 6 per group; four weeks: n = 6 per group; and eight weeks: n = 8 per group).
Histological evaluation
After µCT scanning, the right femurs were decalcified with 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution for three weeks. The samples were embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5 µm thick sections through the site of the fracture. The sections were stained with Toluidine blue and the process of endochondral ossification was evaluated at two, four and eight weeks after surgery. The degree of fracture healing was evaluated using the five-point scale (grades 0 to 4) proposed by Allen, Wase and Bear.17 The assessment was blinded. In addition, the sections at two weeks after surgery were stained for smooth muscle actin to assess angiogenesis. Researchers blinded to the identity of each group counted the number of capillary structures in five random areas around the fracture sites using a light microscope (×200 magnification). The capillary density was then calculated as the number of vessels/mm2 as previously described.18
Gene expression analysis (around the fracture site)
From the two-week old rat model, the tissue around the fracture site was harvested after death, and RNA was isolated (n = 6 per group). Real-time PCR was performed to evaluate fracture healing-related gene levels as described above. All primers and probes used are listed in Table I.
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as means and standard error. Student’s t-test (for two groups), analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test (more than two groups) were used. Probability (p) values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Cell number and population transition after QQ culture
The fold decrease of QQMNCs to PBMNCs per well in all subjects was an average of 0.358-fold (Fig. 1a).
Fig.
Based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting, QQMNCs exhibited enrichment of CD34+ and CD206+ cells compared with PBMNCs (10.01-fold in CD34+ cells, 26.04-fold in CD206+ cells, Table II). In contrast, the population of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor(VEGFR)-2+ and C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2+ cells) was significantly lower in QQMNCs than in PBMNCs (0.33-fold in VEGFR-2+ cells, 0.50-fold in CCR2+ cells) (Supplementary Fig. b).
Table II.
PBMNCs % | QQMNCs % | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
CD34 | 1.20 (se)0.24 | 12.1 (sd)4.04 | < 0.05 |
VEGFR-2 | 15.0 (se)1.86 | 5.02 (sd)1.01 | < 0.01 |
CD206 | 0.434 (se)0.065 | 11.3 (sd)3.93 | < 0.05 |
CCR2 | 25.9 (se)2.71 | 12.9 (sd)4.10 | < 0.01 |
-
% in PBMNCs and % in QQMNCs indicate the % positivity of each cell population in a sample of 20 000 PBMNCs or QQMNCs, data compared with the value of PBMNCs n = 6 volunteers
-
CD34: Cluster of Differentiation 34, VEGFR2: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2. CD206: Cluster of Differentiation 206, CCR2: C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (all p-values Student’s t-test)
Enhanced angiogenic gene expression in QQMNCs
Expression of genes encoding angiogenic factors, including VEGFA and angiopoietin-2 (Ang2), was significantly upregulated in QQMNCs compared with PBMNCs (3.58-fold for VEGF-A, 25.6-fold for Ang2). In contrast, there was no significant difference in Ang1 expression between QQMNCs and PBMNCs (Fig. 1b).
QQMNCs promote tube formation in vitro
In an in vitro tube formation assay involving co-culture with HUVECs, QQMNCs showed greater angiogenic potential at 12 hours. Total tube length in the QQMNC group was significantly longer than in the PBMNC and control groups (tube length 44.5 mm, sd 3.4 for HUVECs and QQMNCs; 39.4 mm, sd 4.7 for HUVECs and PBMNCs; and 38.5 mm, sd 5.1 for HUVECs alone (Fig. 1c).
QQMNCs enhance osteo-induction of MSCs in vitro
At day 3 of co-culture, real-time PCR revealed that the expressions of RUNX2 and Type 1 collagen were significantly upregulated in the QQMNC group compared with the PBMNC and control groups. At day 7, the expression of osteocalcin was significantly higher in the QQMNC group compared with the PBMNC and control groups (Fig. 2a). Alizarin Red staining of co-cultures at day 14 showed a significantly larger stained area in the QQMNC group compared with the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the PBMNC and QQMNC groups (Fig. 2b).
Fig.
QQMNCs accelerate fracture healing
Fracture healing was evaluated by radiographic, µCT, and histological examinations. Rats which received QQMNCs demonstrated the highest rate of fracture healing, with bridging callus formation observed radiographically (50% (3/6) at four weeks, 62.5% (5/8) at eight weeks). In the group of rats receiving PBMNCs, only one achieved radiographic fracture healing at eight weeks (12.5% (1/8)), while none of the rats in the control group achieved radiographic fracture healing (Fig. 3a, Table III). Qi’s radiographic fracture healing score was significantly higher in the QQMNC group than in the other groups at eight weeks (QQMNCs: 5.88, sd 0.64; PBMNCs: 3.0, sd 0.33; control: 2.63, sd 0.182) (Fig. 3a). The µCT analysis confirmed the same rates of fracture healing at eight weeks (QQMNCs: 62.5%; PBMNCs: 12.5%; control: 0%) (Fig. 3b). In the quantitative evaluation of bone formation, the value of BV/TV was significantly higher in the QQMNC group compared with the other groups at eight weeks (QQMNCs: 48.81%, sd 0.90%; PBMNCs: 37.04%, sd 9.13%; control: 34.61%, sd 6.21%) (Fig. 3b).
Fig.
Table III.
2 wks | 4 wks | 6 wks | 8 wks | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control (n, %) | 0/8, 0 | 0/8, 0 | 0/8, 0 | 0/8, 0 |
PBMNCs | 0/8, 0 | 1/8, 12.5 | 1/8, 12.5 | 1/8, 12.5 |
QQMNCs | 0/8, 0 | 4/8, 50 | 4/8, 50 | 5/8, 62.5 |
-
PBMNCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; QQMNCs, quality and quantity control-cultured mononuclear cells
Histological evaluation demonstrated that nonunion sites in the PBMNC and QQMNC groups showed enhanced endochondral ossification consisting of numerous chondrocytes and newly formed trabecular bone at two and four weeks after surgery. In five rats of the QQMNC group and one in the PBMNC group, bridging callus formation was observed at eight weeks. The histological score of fracture healing was significantly greater in the QQMNC group than in the other groups at eight weeks (QQMNCs: 3.50, sd 0.75; PBMNCs: 2.12, sd 0.99; control: 1.87, sd 0.83) (Fig. 4a).
Fig.
QQMNCs enhance angiogenesis and osteogenesis in vivo
Capillary density was significantly greater in the QQMNC group than in the PBMNC and control groups in the tissue harvested at two weeks after transplantation (QQMNCs: 21.67 vessels/mm2, sd 4.96; PBMNCs: 10.95 vessels/mm2, sd 2.56; control: 10.62 vessels/mm2, sd 3.02) (Fig. 4b). In addition, in the QQMNC group, several bone healing-related genes were significantly upregulated (Fig. 5). There were no significant differences in expression of type 1 collagen and osteocalcin among the three groups (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Discussion
Transplantation of CD34+ cells has been shown to promote fracture healing in a nonunion model.17-19 However, difficult and costly isolation procedures are critical drawbacks to their clinical application as they require granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) administration, apheresis, and magnetic cell sorting.18,20-22 On the other hand, PBMNCs constitute a very accessible cell source which can be obtained less invasively at a lower cost compared with CD34+ cells and BMMNCs. Masuda et al cultured PBMNCs in serum-free medium with cytokines and growth factors in an effort to fortify the cells’ angiogenic potential10,12,23 and generated QQMNCs. Our results confirm that cultured PBMNCs have superior potential to accelerate fracture healing compared with freshly isolated PBMNCs in a nude rat model of fracture nonunion.
The presence of circulating Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC)s in adult human peripheral blood was first reported in 1997 by Asahara et al.24 These cells can be obtained as CD34+ cells from adult bone marrow.24-26 Adult EPCs are mobilised from the bone marrow into peripheral blood under tissue ischaemia, where they integrate into ischaemic lesions, differentiate into mature endothelial cells, and contribute to neovascularisation.24,25,27 Masuda et al12 previously demonstrated that QQMNCs cultured from PBMNCs also contributed to neovascularisation, contributing extensively to therapeutic effects on vascular regeneration and tissue repair. When we investigated angiogenic vessel formation by tube formation assay and angiogenic gene expression by RT-PCR in vitro, we found the same result. Furthermore, we showed that QQMNCs promoted the osteogenic induction of MSCs in co-culture experiments. In addition to angiogenesis, CD34+ cells can also differentiate into osteoblasts in vitro without losing their expression of haematopoietic stem cell markers.7,28,29 These findings suggest that CD34+ cells, which form part of the cell fraction of QQMNCs, may also differentiate into osteogenic cells themselves.
Flow cytometry showed that QQMNCs were enriched in CD206+ and impoverished in CCR2+ cells. We speculated that the QQMNC fraction might contain fewer M1 macrophages and more M2 macrophages than PBMNCs. Schlundt et al30 demonstrated that M2 macrophages, which express the cell surface antigen CD206, enhance bone fracture healing. These results support the hypothesis that the enrichment of M2 macrophages in QQMNCs may play a key role in accelerating bone healing.
Many researchers have reported studies on cell therapy for bone fracture healing in the clinical setting. Above all, good results have been reported concerning transplantation of CD34+ cells as EPCs, and a phase I/II clinical trial of autologous CD34+ cell transplantation in patients with tibial or femoral nonunion was performed.8,21,22 Fukui et al19 reported observation of bridging callus formation and complete union in 90% of fracture nonunion models of nude rats at weeks 8 and 12 in the CD34+ group when treated with atelocollagen gel. Our results showed 62.5% bridging callus formation in nonunion models at eight weeks in the QQMNC group. These results may indicate that the therapeutic effect of QQMNCs is less than that of CD34+ cells but may reflect differences in the delivery methods: local injection of a cell suspension versus a 3D carrier. Fukui et al19 also concluded that the transplantation of PBMNCs contributes to bone repair in nonunion models but is less effective than the transplantation of CD34+ cells. In the current study, using our method, we demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of PBMNCs could be fortified. QQMNCs can be prepared easily and at a lower cost than CD34+ cells, rendering them more feasible for application in the clinical setting than CD34+ cells.
This study has some limitations. First, our nonunion models are different from the clinical condition of fracture nonunion. However, we created the model following previous reports14,15 to evaluate whether QQMNCs promote fracture healing. Second, we speculated concerning the role of M2 macrophages, however, we did not show direct evidence of the influence of QQMNC transplantation on these cells. The issue of whether QQMNCs include more M2 macrophages and how the macrophages affect fracture healing will need to be investigated in the future. Finally, the safety of QQMNCs cannot be confirmed, as adverse effects of QQMNCs were not addressed. In our conditioning culture of PBMNCs, high concentrations of five cytokines and growth factors are used. Therefore, a careful safety study of these cells for future clinical application will be necessary.
In conclusion, we have shown that QQMNCs present unique cell fractions with anti-inflammatory phenotype and have more angiogenic and osteogenic potentials than PBMNCs in vitro. Also, we have demonstrated that transplantation of QQMNCs is more effective than PBS or PBMNCs in accelerating bone fracture healing in a fracture nonunion model of nude rats. The QQMNCs can be prepared easily at a low cost and therefore could be a promising option for the treatment of nonunion fractures in the future.
This work was carried out at the Analysis Center of Life Science, Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Hiroshima University.
The QQ culture method of acquiring PBMNCs from peripheral blood, the method of CC culture, as well as Graphs showing PBMNCs and QQMNCs in flow cytometry and positive cell population in 20,000 events in PBMNCs and QQMNCs are available alongside this article at www.bjr.boneandjoint.org.uk
This study was supported by the Highway Program for Realization of Regenerative Medicine from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) to M.O.
None declared
References
1 Colnot CI Helms JA . A molecular analysis of matrix remodeling and angiogenesis during long bone development. Mech Dev2001;100:245-250.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
2 Marsh D . Concepts of fracture union, delayed union, and nonunion. Clin Orthop Relat Res1998;355(Suppl):S22-S30.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
3 Heiple KG Herndon CH . The pathologic physiology of nonunion. Clin Orthop Relat Res1965;43:11-21.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
4 Morshed S Bhandari M . Clinical trial design in fracture-healing research: meeting the challenge. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2008;90-A(Suppl 1):55-61.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
5 Licheng Z Lihai Z Meng X Qi Y Peifu T . Autologous uncultured bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells and modified cannulated screw in repair of femoral neck fracture. J Orthop Res2013;31:1302-1307.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
6 Bruder SP Kurth AA Shea M et al. . Bone regeneration by implantation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res1998;16:155-162.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
7 Matsumoto T Kawamoto A Kuroda R et al. . Therapeutic potential of vasculogenesis and osteogenesis promoted by peripheral blood CD34-positive cells for functional bone healing. Am J Pathol2006;169:1440-1457.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
8 Kuroda R Matsumoto T Niikura T et al. . Local transplantation of granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34+ cells for patients with femoral and tibial nonunion: pilot clinical trial. Stem Cells Transl Med2014;3:128-134.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
9 Masuda H Alev C Akimaru H et al. . Methodological development of a clonogenic assay to determine endothelial progenitor cell potential. Circ Res2011;109:20-37.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
10 Masuda H Iwasaki H Kawamoto A et al. . Development of serum-free quality and quantity control culture of colony-forming endothelial progenitor cell for vasculogenesis. Stem Cells Transl Med2012;1:160-171.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
11 Tanaka R Vaynrub M Masuda H et al. . Quality-control culture system restores diabetic endothelial progenitor cell vasculogenesis and accelerates wound closure. Diabetes2013;62:3207-3217.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
12 Masuda H Tanaka R Fujimura S et al. . Vasculogenic conditioning of peripheral blood mononuclear cells promotes endothelial progenitor cell expansion and phenotype transition of anti-inflammatory macrophage and T lymphocyte to cells with regenerative potential. J Am Heart Assoc2014;3:e000743.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
13 Kalka C Masuda H Takahashi T et al. . Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2000;97:3422-3427.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
14 Kokubu T Hak DJ Hazelwood SJ Reddi AH . Development of an atrophic nonunion model and comparison to a closed healing fracture in rat femur. J Orthop Res2003;21:503-510.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
15 Kodama A Kamei N Kamei G et al. . In vivo bioluminescence imaging of transplanted bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells using a magnetic delivery system in a rat fracture model. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2012;94-B:998-1006.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
16 Qi Y Zhao T Yan W et al. . Mesenchymal stem cell sheet transplantation combined with locally released simvastatin enhances bone formation in a rat tibia osteotomy model. Cytotherapy2013;15:44-56.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
17 Allen HL Wase A Bear WT . Indomethacin and aspirin: effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the rate of fracture repair in the rat. Acta Orthop Scand1980;51:595-600.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
18 Yasuhara S Yasunaga Y Hisatome T et al. . Efficacy of bone marrow mononuclear cells to promote bone regeneration compared with isolated CD34+ cells from the same volume of aspirate. Artif Organs2010;34:594-599.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
19 Fukui T Mifune Y Matsumoto T et al. . Superior Potential of CD34-Positive Cells Compared to Total Mononuclear Cells for Healing of Nonunion Following Bone Fracture. Cell Transplant2015;24:1379-1393.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
20 Kawakami Y Ii M Alev C et al. . Local transplantation of ex vivo expanded bone marrow-derived CD34-positive cells accelerates fracture healing. Cell Transplant2012;21:2689-2709.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
21 Kuroda R Matsumoto T Kawakami Y et al. . Clinical impact of circulating CD34-positive cells on bone regeneration and healing. Tissue Eng Part B Rev2014;20:190-199.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
22 Kuroda R Matsumoto T Miwa M et al. . Local transplantation of G-CSF-mobilized CD34(+) cells in a patient with tibial nonunion: a case report. Cell Transplant2011;20:1491-1496.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
23 Alaiti MA Ishikawa M Masuda H et al. . Up-regulation of miR-210 by vascular endothelial growth factor in ex vivo expanded CD34+ cells enhances cell-mediated angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med2012;16:2413-2421.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
24 Asahara T Murohara T Sullivan A et al. . Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science1997;275:964-967.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
25 Asahara T Masuda H Takahashi T et al. . Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res1999;85:221-228.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
26 Shi Q Rafii S Wu MH et al. . Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood1998;92:362-367.PubMed Google Scholar
27 Takahashi T Kalka C Masuda H et al. . Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med1999;5:434-438.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
28 Chen JL Hunt P McElvain M et al. . Osteoblast precursor cells are found in CD34+ cells from human bone marrow. Stem Cells1997;15:368-377.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
29 Mifune Y Matsumoto T Kawamoto A et al. . Local delivery of granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34-positive progenitor cells using bioscaffold for modality of unhealing bone fracture. Stem Cells2008;26:1395-1405.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar
30 Schlundt C El Khassawna T Serra A et al. . Macrophages in bone fracture healing: Their essential role in endochondral ossification. Bone2015;S8756-3282:00392-0.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar