Abstract
Background
The advantages of treatment by open reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur have been well known for several decades. Failure of fixation can result in revision surgery, prolonged inpatient stay and has major socio-economic consequences. There are many new devices on the market to help deal with this problem. Expandable hip screw (EHS) is one such device, which is an expanding bolt that may offer superior fixation in osteoporotic bone compared to the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) type device.
Methods
Static axial compression tests with elastic deformation of the specimens were performed with a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min to determine stiffness of testing was performed with 3 cycles from 0 N to 250 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 500 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 750 N and 3 cycles from 0 N to 1000 N with a holding time of 10 s per test cycle. Displacement control was apply the pullout strength with a velocity of 1mm/sec. The ability to resist rotation about the axis of a lag screw is of critical importance particularly when the fracture line is perpendicular, or nearly perpendicular, to the femoral neck. Implants were subjected to a rotation of 1 degree/sec and peak torque values were recorded.
Results
The mean axial cyclic loading DHS showed higher stiffness value than EHS. The mean stiffness achieved at pullout test in the EHS and DHS groups were 587.8N/mm and, 334.1N/mm respectively (p<0.05). The peak torque for the EHS device was significantly greater than the torque for the DHS with torque values of 4.56 Nm/degree and 2.97 Nm/degree, respectively (p<0.05).
Conclusions
The EHS device demonstrated superior resistance to pullout and torsion greater loads compared to the DHS in an unstable fracture model. However, axial cyclic loading demonstrate lower strength, by optimising the size of device will perform.
Level of Evidence
Level 5
