header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

COMPARISON BETWEEN CLAMPING DRAINAGE AND NON-CLAMPING DRAINAGE AFTER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 2015, Annual Conference, 2–4 September 2015. Part 2.



Abstract

Background

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is one of the most common surgeries in our speciality, with a high risk of significant blood loss and consequent transfusion. The drain clamping is usually applied to reduce both blood loss and transfusion in this procedure. However, this method is still somewhat controversial too.

Method

We performed a prospective randomised study of 74 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. All were treated in our centre with TKR. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In group A we included patients whose drainage system was clamped temporarily (during the first 6 postoperative hours). Group B includes those patients in who we use traditional system, with continuous suction drain that was placed after surgery.

Results

A statistically significant difference in haemoglobin loss after surgery was found, with 0.83 g/dl less decline in patients with temporary clamping drains. The decrease of haematocrit levels, the blood loss or the number of transfusions were lower in the temporary clamping group, but without statistic significance. No cases with wound infection neither clinical venous thromboembolism were detected in our group.

Conclusions

These results suggest that drainage clamping during the first 6 postoperatative hours reduces the postoperative anaemia, without increasing morbidity after TKR.