Abstract
Introduction
Despite several studies, controversies prevailed about the rate of complications following one-stage and two-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). In current prospective study, we compared the complications and functional outcomes of one-stage and two-stage procedures.
Methods
One hundred and eighty patients (ASA class I or II) with bilateral hip osteoarthritis were assigned randomly to two equal groups. Two groups were matched in term of age and sex. All of the surgeries were performed through the Harding approach using uncemented implants. In two-stage procedures, surgeries were performed with 6 months to one year interval. All patients were evaluated one year postoperatively.
Results
The Harris hip score averaged 84.1±12.6 and 82.6±15.3 in one-stage and two-stage groups, respectively (p=0.528). The hospital stay was significantly longer in two-stage group (9.8±1.1 versus 4.9±0.8 days). The cumulative hemoglobin drop and number of transfused blood units were the same. One patient in each group developed symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and managed successfully. There was no patient with perioperative death, pulmonary embolism, infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture or heterotrophic ossification. No patient required reoperation. Two patients in one-stage group developed unilateral temporary peroneal nerve palsy resolved after 3 and 4 months.
Conclusion
The current study showed that one-stage bilateral THA can be used successfully for patients who require bilateral hip arthroplasty without increased rate of complications. The functional and clinical outcomes are comparable and hospital stay is significantly shorter. However, the authors recommend to perform one-stage bilateral THA for healthy patients with ASA class I or II.
