Abstract
Introduction
Total ankle replacement (TAR) is surgically complex; malalignment can arise due to surgical technique or failure to correct natural varus/valgus malalignment. Across joint replacement, malalignment has been associated with pain, component edge loading, increased wear and higher failure rates. Good component alignment is considered instrumental for long term TAR success. The conforming surface geometry of mobile bearing TARs leaves no freedom for coronal plane malalignment. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effect of coronal alignment on a mobile bearing TAR.
Methods
Three TARs (Zenith, Corin Group) were tested under five coronal malalignment angles from 0–10° in a single station electromechanical knee simulator applying a typical ankle gait profile. As swing phase load is critical to TAR contact mechanics but will vary depending on the joint laxity. Swing loads of 100N, 300N and 500N were investigated. A positive control test with a swing load of 1000N was also studied, and was expected to eliminate the majority of lift off effects. Under each condition, the version was allowed to move freely while tests were performed, and the version profile under each alignment angle was recorded. Each test was carried out for 600 cycles in 25% bovine serum. Under the same loading conditions, but without lubrication, a Tekscan sensor recorded data from two cycles to assess the change in contact pressure and area at the five coronal angles.
Results
Across the three TARs the effect of the swing phase load varied the biomechanics with a similar pattern. The high swing load of 1000N eliminates the majority of version while with 100N swing loads the TAR abducts for the length of the swing phase only realigning when the force increases, the extent dependent on the malalignment angle. At both 300N and 500N swing loads there is an oscillation apparent which changes the contact mechanics.
The Tekscan results (Figure 1b) show changes in the contact area at three points in the load cycle; swing, the lower peak and the peak load (Figure 1a). With any degree of malalignment, component lift off is highly prevalent under lower swing phase loads of 100–300N. As the swing load is increased, this effect is only noticeable at greater malalignment angles.
Discussion
The observed component lift off results in edge loading and peak pressures occurring at the insert edges. When the insert is 10 degrees coronally malaligned and the insert is brought fully into contact, the peak pressure reaches 16–18MPa, a pressure similar to the yield stress of polyethylene. The high contact pressures will likely elevate the wear and may increase the potential for polyethylene failure.
Conclusion
Biomechanical testing has shown the malalignment of a total ankle replacement combined with the joint tension may change the contact mechanics and potentially increase wear.
For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).
