Abstract
Purpose
Recently, kinematic aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained interest for achieving better clinical outcomes over mechanical aligned TKA. The primary goal of kinematic aligned TKA is to position the femoral and tibial components so that the angles and levels of the distal and posterior femoral joint lines and the tibial joint line are each restored to the patient's natural alignment, and not to a neutral limb alignment that is unnatural for most patients. Despite good clinical outcomes reported at short to mid-term follow-up, surgeons should know reasons why this method is useful and safe surgery and carefully assess the long-term outcomes until this new technique is settled as standardized procedure for TKA. The main purpose of the present study was to compare postoperative radiography and clinical scores following kinematic and mechanical aligned TKA.
Methods
Sixty TKAs—30 kinematic and 30 mechanical aligned—were performed in patients with varus-type osteoarthritis using a navigation system. Using postoperative double-leg and single-leg standing long leg radiographs, joint line orientation angle to the floor, conventional mechanical axis (cMA), and true mechanical axis (tMA; line from hip center to the lowest point of calcaneus) were compared between the two groups. One-year after surgeries, range of motion and the patient-derived score of the 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS), which includes four categories: symptoms, patient satisfaction, patient expectations, and functional activities, e.g., walking/standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities, were compared between the two groups
Results
Joint line orientation angles were 1.3 ±1.8 ° varus in the kinematic and 3.2 ± 2.7° valgus in the mechanical group with double-leg standing condition (p<0.05), which were shifted to 0.7 ± 1.7° valgus and 4.3 ± 1.9° valgus with single-leg standing condition, respectively. In double-leg standing condition, cMAs passed through 43.8 ± 10.2 % in the kinematic and 48.7 ± 7.6 % in the mechanical group (p<0.05), which were shifted to 49.2 ± 12.2 % and 53.7 ± 7.5 % in tMA assessment, respectively. Postoperative flexion angle was significantly better in kinematic aligned TKA compared with mechanical aligned TKA (121.7±9.1 vs. 117.3±14.8, p<0.05). Among 4 contents of 2011 KSS, only functional activity score showed better results in the kinematic group compared with the mechanical group (p<0.05).
Conclusions
Kinematic aligned TKA exhibited parallel joint line to the floor during single and double-leg standing and neutral weight-bearing in tMA when compared with mechanical aligned TKA, which might result in better functional score.
