Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of multi-radius (MR, n=20) versus gradually reducing radius (GR, n=18) knee design on the kinematics and kinetics of the knee during level ground walking one year after total knee arthroplasty.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-eight knees with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were examined before and one year after total knee arthroplasty. The groups consisted of subjects who had undergone total knee arthroplasty with a representative MR designed implant (B Braun-Aesculap Vega® Knee System) and a representative GR designed implant (Depuy Attune® Knee System) (Figure 1). The kinematic and kinetic parameters of knee varus angle, first peak knee adduction moment, sagittal plane knee excursion and extensor moment were evaluated during gait, as well as the spatiotemporal gait outcomes of walking speed, stride length, cadence, step length, the percentage of stance phase. Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative outcomes were done by the paired t-test. Independent t-test was also done to compare the postoperative outcomes of MR designed implant and GR designed implant.
Results
In spatiotemporal parameters of GR implant group, there was an increase in walking speed, stride length and cadence (all p<0.05) and no change in step length and the percentage of stance phase postoperatively. GR implant group showed large reductions in varus angle and adduction moment (all p<0.001), a significant increase in extensor moment (p=0.01), and a small reduction in sagittal plane excursion (p=0.04) after surgery. In comparison of two groups at one year after surgery, there were no significant differences of all spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic parameters between two groups except varus angle. GR implant group showed more reduction in varus angle than MR implant group (p=0.01).
Conclusions
Total knee arthroplasty performed with gradually reducing radius knee design reduces frontal plane loading patterns of knee varus angle and adduction moment and provided improvement in spatiotemporal parameters. Post-operatively there were no statistical differences between the MR implant group and the GR implant group in any of the kinematic and kinetic measures except knee varus angle during level ground walking.
