Abstract
Calcium phosphate cements (CPC) are used as biocompatible and bioactive bone void fillers. Ideally, the mechanical properties of these cements should match those of the surrounding bone. The knowledge of the real mechanical properties of the material is important in the decision-making process regarding possible use of the CPCs in different anatomical sites. Although it is generally recognized that these cements are stiffer and more brittle than desired, there is a limited amount of data about the possible deformation of this class of material before failure. The focus of this study was to determine these properties of injectable CPCs.
Two different types of self-setting CPCs were investigated in this study: i) hydroxyapatite (HA), that historically has been the most widely studied CPC; ii) brushite, that recently has attracted attention due to its faster resorption than that of HA in vivo. Specimens of both cement types were prepared by mixing a powder phase with a liquid phase that were left to harden in phosphate buffered saline at 37°C. Once set, the specimens underwent a quasi-static compressive test to determine the compressive strength, the elastic modulus and the maximum deformation of the two materials. The material testing machine was equipped with a digital image correlation system, which allows accurate measurement of material deformation directly on the specimen surface.
Brushite was found to be significantly more stiff (+80%) and resistant (+84%) than HA. Similar findings were found for the energy needed to create a first crack on the specimen surface. However, the first crack appeared on the specimen surface at the same low deformation level (∼0.15%) independently of the type of material tested. Complete failure of both materials occurred, on average, before reaching 0.25%.
It has been demonstrated that the compressive behaviour of CPCs depends on their composition and porosity [1]. One of the main reasons for the high strength and stiffness of the brushite studied here was its low porosity (∼12%). However, the maximum deformation is not positively affected by this decrease in porosity. In fact, both materials show the same brittle behaviour, i.e. they undergo comparably little deformation before they break. Under these conditions, increasing the compressive strength may not always be beneficial clinically, e.g. in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, where the high stiffness of the bone cements used has been identified as a risk factor for adjacent-level fractures [2]. However, it is not clear whether a 20-fold higher stiffness than the trabecular bone would give a different clinical outcome than a 10-fold higher stiffness. These high-strength, high-stiffness cements may also be used as a basis for further biomaterial development, e.g. in the creation of macro-porous scaffolds, which is usually challenging due to the commonly low mechanical properties of the base CPC material.
