Abstract
Foreword
Silver coatings, used in many surgical devices, have demonstrated good antimicrobial activity and low toxicity. Oncological musculoskeletal surgery have an high risk of infection, so in the last decades, silver coated mega-prostheses have been introduced and are becoming increasingly widespread.
Material and methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 158 cases of bone tumors, primary or metastatic, treated between 2002–2014 with wide margins resection and reconstruction with tumoral implants. The average age was 59 years (range 11–78 years), all patients were treated by the same surgeon, with antibiotic prophylaxis according to a standard protocol. In 58.5% of patients were implanted silver-coated prostheses, in the remaining part, standard tumor prosthesis. Patients were re-evaluated annually and were recorded complications, with particular attention to infectious diseases.
Results
The mean follow-up was 39.5 months. 23.4% of patients died at a median time of 34.9 months after surgery. 18.4% develop complications that required a new surgery, in 12.6% of cases due to infectious problems. Patients treated with silver-coated implants developed early infection in 2.2% of cases against the 10.7% of the patients treated with standard tumor prosthesis. This different among the two groups was statistically significant, while the percentage of late infections, occurred from 6 months after surgery, was similar between groups. Assuming a reduction of antimicrobial silver activity in the time, it was carried out a microscopic analyses [Fig. 1] of silver-coated prostheses explanted 82 months and 27 months after surgery. It confirmed an important degradation of the coating surface with almost complete absence of silver. Silver blood level, taken in a sample of patients, at different time after surgery, always showed values well below the threshold of toxicity, and no patient has never shown any sign of local or general toxicity secondary to silver [Fig. 2].
Discussion
Our study demonstrates that tumor silver-coated implants have a rate of early infection significantly less than traditional implants, while there were no differences in the rate of late infections, as described also in the literature. This likely is related to wear of the silver coating, which occurs on average around 2 years after implantation.
Conclusion
We recommend to use silver–coated prosthesis as primary implants for limb salvage surgery, in primary or metastatic bone tumors, considering the absence of signs of toxicity and the lower rate of early infection.
