Abstract
Retrieval studies of metal-on-metal (MOM) resurfaced hips revealed cup “edge wear” as a common failure mechanism [Morlock-2008]. Retrieval analysis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) also demonstrated extensive rim wear (Fig. 1: 190–220o arcs), typically across the superior cup [Clarke-2013]. Such wear patterns have not been demonstrated in hip simulator studies. The simulator “steep cup” models typically had motion arcs (flexion, etc.) input via the femoral head [Leslie-2008, Angadji-2009]. With fixed-inclination cups this produces constant loading of cup rim against the head (Fig. 2a). This is unlikely to be the physiological norm, unless patients walk constantly on the rims of mal-positioned cups. More likely the patients produce edge-wear intermittently due to functional and postural variations. Therefore a novel simulator model is proposed in which the cup undergoes edge-wear intermittently at one extreme of flexion (Fig. 2a). Our study objective using this new simulator model (Fig. 2a, b) was to (i) demonstrate MOM wear-rates and wear patches as a function of these dynamic-inclinations (40 o, 50 o, 70o), and (ii) compare the simulator data to MOM retrievals (Fig. 1).
Two simulator studies were run, both using 60mm MOM. Four bearings were run to 1-million cycles (1Mc) with cups peaking at 40 and 50° dynamic-inclinations, thus providing control data with no edge-wear. In 2nd study, 4 MOM were run with cups given a dynamic-inclination of 70° to produce edge-wear effects. In study-2 currently at 2.5Mc duration, the femoral heads showed the two classical wear phases with run-in at 1.7mm³/Mc and steady-state at 0.084mm³/Mc (Fig. 3a). Wear-rate for cups at 2.34mm³/Mc was 40% higher than heads and continued to rise linearly with time (Fig. 3a). At 2.5Mc, cup wear averaged ×5.7 greater than heads and resulting wear-patterns extended 85°−225° around cup rim (Fig. 3b: average 151°). In study-1, wear patches in cups with 40° dynamic-inclination approached within 12.4mm of the cup rim as denoted by circumferential grooves. This margin-of-safety (MOS) represented a 24°angle. The cup wear-patch averaged area of 1,760mm2. With cups run at 70o dynamic-inclination, the wear patches were transferred an additional 30o towards the rim thereby representing a 6° transfer across the rim.
This is the 1st wear study to use the new dynamic-inclination test mode to better simulate cup function in vivo. It was particularly satisfying to see the similarity in wear-patterns between retrieval (Fig. 1) and simulator cups (Fig. 3b). It is also the 1st study to monitor sites and magnitudes of cup wear areas and to purposely produce “edge wear”. The cups with 40° and 50° dynamic-inclinations had large margins of safety. With 70° dynamic-inclination the margin of safety was lost - effectively there was a 6° transfer of the wear patch across the cup rim. Even this apparently small effect at one location in each gait cycle sufficiently perturbed MOM performance that wear increased by an order of magnitude. Notably this was all cup wear and not by femoral head participation. The study continues but at 2.5Mc duration the cups revealed 5-fold greater wear than heads.
