header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

COMPARISON OF BIO-RSA OUTCOMES WITH STANDARD REVERSE-TSR IN A SINGLE CENTRE

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), 27th Annual Congress. PART 3.



Abstract

We undertook 37 reverse total shoulder replacements within a 2 yr period for chronic complex shoulder conditions. All cases were undertook by one of two upper limb consultant orthopaedic surgeons. At time of listing for operation, the decision as to whether to undertake a bony-increased offset reverse total shoulder was made. Retrospective data was collected on the need for analgesia at final follow up and range of movement.

Of the 37 patients, 12 underwent BIO-RSA procedures. Indications for surgery was predominantly rotator cuff arthropathy (n=9) but two patients had severe OA and one had a complex proximal humeral fracture. The average age of the patient was 76.6 yrs (69–87 yrs) with a mean follow-up of 6.8 months (6 weeks to 1 yr).

The remaining 25 patients were similar in terms of indication, with 18 patients with cuff tear arthropathies and 7 with severe OA. Average age was slightly lower at 74.9 years (50–85).

In terms of range of movement, outcomes between the two groups were broadly similar; those receiving BIO-RSA having an active forward flexion of 90.5° (50–130°) and abduction 88.6° (40–160°). Both groups had excellent analgesic effect with 92% in each either being completely painfree (33.3% BIO-RSA and 44% RSA) or requiring only occasional analgesia. The vast majority of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of the surgery, with one patient in the BIO-RSA group being slightly dissatisfied and three in RSA group.

If grafting is necessary, the use of BIO-RSA within this centre seems to have comparable results to those undergoing standard RSA.


Email: