header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

POLYETHYLENE WEAR IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH A 22.225 MM DIAMETER HEAD AT AN AVERAGE TEN YEARS' FOLLOW-UP

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), 27th Annual Congress. PART 2.



Abstract

Introduction

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was developed to reduce the wear of articular-bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to compare the mean linear wear of HXLPE with a 22.225 mm diameter zirconia head with that of conventional polyethylene (CPE) with a 22.225 mm diameter ortron head.

Materials and Methods

A prospective cohort study performed on 93 patients (113 hips) who had undergone primary cemented THAs at our hospital between January 2001 and December 2003. The subject population included 85 females and 8 males with a mean age of 58.0 years (22 to 78) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up period was 10.2 years (9 to 12). We randomly used two types of implants: the HXLPE cup with a 22.225 mm diameter zirconia head (Kyocera Medical, Osaka, Japan) in 60 hips (HXLPE group), and the CPE cup with a 22.225 mm diameter ortron head (DePuy International, Leeds, UK) in 53 hips (CPE group). Linear wear (penatration) by computer-assisted method with PolyWare software (Draftware Inc, Indiana, USA) was measured at 10 years. Anteroposterior radiographs were evaluated for osteolysis or component loosening defined by the criteria of Hodgkinson et al. Analysis of covariance using the general linear models procedure was carried out to determine the linear wear rate difference between the groups after adjusting for variables (age at surgery, sex, body mass index, vertical distance, horizontal distance, cup inclination, and cup anteversion) as covariates. The differences were considered significant when the p value was <0.05.

Results

The mean linear wear rate of HXLPE was 0.043 mm/year, compared with 0.109 mm/year for CPE (p<0.05). The incidence of osteolysis was 1 hip in the CPE group, compared with none in the HXLPE group. No evidence of revision for any reasons was noted. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences among any variables.

Conclusions

Polyethylene wear of HXLPE with a 22.225 mm zirconia head remains significantly lower than that of CPE with a 22.225 mm ortron head at 10 years after operation. HXLPE has a great advantage but careful continued follow-up will be required.


Email: