Abstract
Background
We compared platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection to cortisone (40mg triamcinolone) injection in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis resistant to traditional nonoperative management. The aims were to compare early and long term efficacy of PRP to that of Steroid (3, 6 and 12 months after injection).
Methods
60 heels with intractable plantar fasciitis with failed conservative treatment were randomized to either PRP or Steroid injection. All patients were assessed with Roles-Maudsley (RM) Score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Data was collected prospectively on the cohort, pre-treatment, at 3, 6 and 12 months post injection. The mean scores of the two groups were compared using Student t test.
Results
Pre-injection, the two groups were well matched with no statistically significant difference in the values. At 3 months, all three outcome scores in both groups had significantly improved from their pretreatment level with no significant difference between the groups (PRP: RM 3.7 to 2.0, VAS 8.3 to 3.5, AOFAS 58 to 84; Steroid: RM 3.6 to 1.9, VAS 8.3 to 2.8, AOFAS 57 to 86).
At 6 months, improvement was maintained in both groups with no significant difference between groups (PRP: RM 2.1, VAS 3.7, AOFAS 89; Steroid: RM 2.2, VAS 3.3, and AOFAS 84).
At 12 months, all outcome measures were significantly better for the PRP group as response in the steroid group had deteriorated (PRP: RM 1.9, VAS 3.3 and AOFAS 89; Steroid: RM 2.6, VAS 5.1 and AOFAS 77: p = 0.008, 0.02 and 0.002 respectively).
Conclusions
PRP is better for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis as compared to steroid. It shows no statistical difference in effectiveness early on, but unlike steroid, its effectiveness does not wear off with time, making it more durable.
