header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO IMPROVE THE VARUS/VALGUS TIBIAL ALIGNMENT IN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

The South African Orthopaedic Association (SAOA) 60th Annual Congress



Abstract

Background:

Varus or Valgus malpositioning of tibial prosthetic components in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery may lead to early failure due to increased polyethelene wear, soft tissue imbalancing, aseptic loosening and eventually revision surgery. Therefore, the clinical success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correlates with good component alignment.

Conventional methods of coronal tibial alignment result in an acceptable range of prosthetic alignment in relation to the anatomical axis (tibial tangent angle). The measurement ranges from 90° ± 3°, but literature quotes that there is up to 27% of cases with coronal tibial alignment deviation of greater than 3°. Many studies show that the use of conventional intramedullary rod alignment versus extramedullary rod alignment gives similar results.

The tibial alignment and overall prosthetic alignment in TKA has improved remarkably by using computerized navigation assisted surgery (CAS), with tibial tangent angle of 90° ± 3 in up to 97% of cases. However, the success of accurate tibial and femoral alignment depends on the surgeon and the data fed to the computer. Also long term results on survival rates of TKR using CAS is still pending.

It is clear that assessing tibial alignment (ie. anatomical axis) with whatever method used faces challenges which will affect the tibial bony cuts and the final tibial tangent angle.

To achieve a 90° tibial cut in relation to the anatomical axis we made use of fluoroscopy intra-operatively to assess the anatomical axis of the tibia and the correct alignment of the tibial cutting block.

Methods:

TKR's were performed on 36 consecutive patients over a 4 month period. The aim was to assess the coronal tibial alignment of the tibial component intra-operatively using fuloroscopy. A conventional manual extramedullary alignment rod with its tibial cutting block was used and the final positioning was confirmed with an image intensifier. The tibial cutting block must be at 90° to the anatomical axis of the tibia.

The rest of the TKR procedures were performed as routinely described. Post-operative radiographs were taken on the same day as the surgery and again at six week follow up visit when the tibial tangent angle was measured.

Results:

The coronal tibial angulation was consistent at 0° in 32 knees with a 1°–2° deviation in 4 knees.

Conclusion:

We conclude that the use of fluoroscopy intra-operatively can improve the tibial component alignment and thus decrease the cumulative errors which have significant and dramatic effects on the function and the longevity of the total knee prosthesis.