header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

TREATMENT OF INTERNAL ROTATION CONTRACTURE OF THE SHOULDER IN OBSTETRIC BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY: A REVIEW OF OUTCOMES

The South African Orthopaedic Association (SAAO) 59th Annual Congress



Abstract

Purpose of study

Internal rotation (IR) contracture of the shoulder is a frequent complication of obstetric brachial plexus injury, even in the face of full neurological recovery. Surgical procedures to treat this complication include tendon transfers, capsular release and osteotomies. We compared the outcomes in patients who had arthroscopic release only and those who also underwent a tendon transfer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all patients with OBPI presenting to our unit in the years 2002–2012 who underwent surgical procedures for the treatment of an IR contracture of the shoulder. Increase in range of external rotation (ER) in adduction and abduction intra-operatively was recorded. At follow-up, active ER, the Mallet score, presence of an ER contracture and the “drop-arm” sign was recorded.

Results

25 procedures were performed in 22 patients. Mean intra-operative gain in ER was greatest in those patients who had simultaneous arthroscopic release and a tendon transfer (83.3° and 60.5° in adduction and abduction respectively). This group had the greatest average range of active ER at follow up (47.5°), the lowest incidence of a “drop-arm” sign (14%), but also the highest incidence of ER contracture (75%). Patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior shoulder release only, had the highest average Mallet score at final follow up (17.1 compared to 16.3 in the scope and tendon transfer group), 45% incidence of a “drop-arm” sign and also the lowest incidence of ER contracture (32%). General satisfaction was greatest in the scope plus tendon transfer group.

Conclusion

Patients who had arthroscopic release and tendon transfer had better ER range and power but more severe ER contractures than patients who underwent arthroscopic release only. Patient satisfaction and Mallet scores were comparable between the two groups and therefore bring into question the need for early tendon transfer in these patients.

NO DISCLOSURES