header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

RESULTS OF A TWO-YEAR, PROSPECTIVE, CONTROLLED STUDY OF METAL ION RELEASE FOLLOWING METAL-ON-METAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT BEFORE AND AFTER REVISION WITH AN ALGORITHM TO DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGE METAL-ON-METAL HIP PATIENTS

8th Combined Meeting Of Orthopaedic Research Societies (CORS)



Abstract

Summary

Management of metal on metal hip replacements can be accomplished with a simple algorithm including easily available metal ion levels and hip MRI with metal artifact reducing software. After revision serum metal ion levels can be expected to fall rapidly.

Introduction

Metallic ion release may be related to bearing surface wear and thus serves as an indicator of the in-vivo performance of metal on metal articulations. The purpose of this prospective, controlled study was to compare new large head metal on metal hip components with established modular metal on metal and metal on polyethylene and to determine their effects on serum metal levels before and after revision.

Patients & Methods

We performed a multi-surgeon, prospective, controlled trial to compare clinical, radiographic, and metal ion concentration in serum (cobalt and chrome) results across multiple devices including the Large Head ASR XL System (MoM-1), the Ultamet Advanced Modularity System (MoM-2), and as the control the Pinacle Acetabular Cup System with polyethylene liner (MoP). One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing THA were enrolled in the study: MoM-1 n=97; MoM-2 n=22; MoP n=32. Clinical, radiographic, and venous blood assessments were performed pre-operatively, and post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, and after revision (1,3,6,12 months). All serum ion concentrations are reported in nmol/L. We are following metal ion levels after revision and have developed an algorithm to diagnose and manage patients with MoM THA.

Results

MoM-1 patients had significantly increased average cobalt and chromium levels. Clinical scores improved after surgery in all groups and continued to improve in MoM-2 and MoP patients after 2 years but decreased slightly in the MoM-1 patients at 2 years. Average cup inclination angle did not differ significantly between the groups: MoM-1 50.2, MoM-2 47.8, and MoP 51.7. In the MoM-1 group 11 patients (11%) had significantly elevated ion levels (MoM-1 Outliers). Nine hips (9.3%) in 8 MoM-1 outlier patients required revision. Metal ion levels were not significantly different between MoM-2 and MoP groups. Metal ion levels after revision in the MoM-1 group decreased rapidly but at one year post-operatively have still not returned to an equivalent baseline comparable to the MoM-2 and MoP groups. All revisions were in the MoM-1 group. Chromium levels decreased more slowly than Cobalt levels.

Discussion

To our knowledge this is the only data in the literature prospectively comparing ion levels among groups and reporting post revision ion levels. Average serum ion levels were elevated at all post-operative samples in the MoM-1 group but this was due to significantly elevated levels in a subset of outliers who required revision. Excluding the outliers there is not a significant difference in post-operative ion levels between the groups. There was no radiographic evidence of component malposition or aseptic loosening in any of the groups. Control groups (MoM-2, MoP) performed comparatively across all variables. We present an algorithm to diagnose and manage patients with metal on metal THA and offer evidence that metal ion levels do decrease after revision but still remain abnormally elevated at one-year post revision compared to the control group. A significant portion of MoM-1 performs comparatively to the controls in terms of ions.