header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Children's Orthopaedics

ARTHROERESIS FOR SYMPTOMATIC PAEDIATRIC FLATFEET: EARLY RESULTS

British Society for Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS)



Abstract

Purpose

To establish the early outcome, satisfaction and complications of sinus tarsi implants in the management of symptomatic flexible flatfeet for a paediatric population

Methods and results

We included all patients aged 18 years or less who were treated for flexible flatfeet with a sinus tarsi implant between January 2010 and June 2012. We excluded patients who had a history of clubfeet or tarsal coalition.

34 patients had 59 implants. The mean age at surgery was 13.7 yrs (9–17 yrs), with mean follow-up of 22 months (range 10–35). Mean AOFAS improved from 65.7 to 87.9 (p<0.001), with an improvement in AOFAS pain scores (p=0.0001). Radiographic correction occurred in all feet, with average improvement of the anteroposterior talar-second metatarsal angle of 16 degrees, and the lateral talar-first metatarsal angle of 9 degrees. Implant placement satisfaction rate was 86%, with 81% claiming that they would have the procedure again. Complications included peroneal spasm (8%), extrusion (7%), revision (5%), and removal (5%). Peroneal spasm was recalcitrant in 3 of the 5 cases, and those with spasm had a higher average forefoot abduction measurement (35 degrees) than the remaining treated cases (25 degrees).

Conclusion

In paediatric patients with flexible flatfeet, utilisation of the sinus tarsi implant has good short-term outcome, with our failure and revision rates comparable to other published studies in the adult population. We introduce the concept of isolated subtalar hyperlaxity which appeared to be a distinct etiological factor. A learning curve in assessing implant size was noted. Overcorrection and implant migration were the indications for revision surgery. Severe forefoot abduction appears to have a poorer outcome, and may be associated with peroneal spasm.

Level of evidence: IV