header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Evaluation of Soft Tissue Contribution for Hip Stability

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA)



Abstract

[Introduction]

It is said that the mechanical stress is a main factor to advance degenerative osteoarthritis. Therefore, to keep the joint stability is very important to minimize mechanical stress. Methods to evaluate bone-related factor are almost established, especially in hip dysplasia. On the other hand, it is unclear how much each soft tissue contribute to the joint stability. In this study we evaluated the soft tissue contribution for hip joint stability by distraction testing using MTS machine.

[Materials & Methods]

We used seven fresh frozen hips from four donors, whose race was all western and reason of death was not related to hip disease in all cases. Average age of them at death was 83 years old. Mean average weight and height were each 52 kg and 162 cm. We retrieved hemi pelvis and proximal femur which kept hip joint intact. We removed all other soft tissue except iliofemoral ligament, pubofemoral ligament, ischiofemoral ligament and capsule. The hemi-pelvis mounted on angular-changeable fixator and the femur fixed to MTS machine (Figure 1). XY sliding table was used to minimize the horizontal direction stress during distraction. MTS machine was set to pull the femur parallel to its shaft by 0.4 mm/sec velocity against pelvis after 10N compression and to keep 5 mm distance for 5 seconds. We measured the force at 1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm distraction. In case the joint was dislocated, the maximum force just before dislocation was recorded. The specimen was changed its posture as neutral (flexion0° abduction0° external rotation0°), flexion (flexion60° abduction0° external rotation0°), abduction (flexion0° abduction30° external rotation0°) and extension (extension20° abduction0° external rotation0°). Each position was measured in six sequential conditions, which are normal, Incised iliofemoral ligament, Circumferentially incised capsule, resected capsule, labral radial tear and resected labrum. After measurement joint surface was observed to evaluate the joint condition.

[Results]

We excluded the one specimen two hips by osteoarthritic change of joint surface. The average force needed for 5 mm distraction in normal condition at neutral, flexion, extension and abduction posture was each 95.8N, 52.7N, 162.8N and 94.2N. The force was biggest in extension posture and smallest in flexion posture. The force was statistically reduced from 95.8N to 31.5N after iliofemoral ligament incision in neutral position. The force was also statistically reduced from 145.6N to 31.9N after Circumferential capsule incision in extension posture (Figure 2). In all posture, traction force was reduced after capslotomy and all hip dislocated in all cases.

[Discussion]

We could conclude that iliofemoral ligament works much in neutral and extension posture, and capsule helps its work in extension more than in neutral posture. We have reported the zona orbicularis will be important as joint stabilizer before. Capsule including zona orbicularis makes hip joint more stable in any posture because dislocation happened easily after capsule resection in all posture.


*Email: