Abstract
INTRODUCTION
There is strong current interest to provide reliable treatments for one- and two-compartment arthritis in the cruciate-ligament intact knee. An alternative to total knee arthroplasty is to resurface only the diseased compartments with discrete compartmental components. Placing multiple small implants into the knee presents a greater surgical challenge than total knee arthroplasty, and it is not certain natural knee mechanics can be maintained. The goal of this study was to compare functional kinematics in cruciate-intact knees with either medial unicondylar (mUKA), mUKA plus patellofemoral (mUKA+PF), or bi-unicondylar (biUNI) arthroplasty using discrete compartmental implants with preparation and placement assisted by haptic robotic technology.
METHODS
Nineteen patients with 21 knee arthroplasties consented to participate in an I.R.B. approved study of knee kinematics with a cruciate-retaining multicompartmental knee arthroplasty system. All subjects presented with knee OA, intact cruciate ligaments, and coronal deformity ranging from 7° varus to 4° valgus. All subjects received multicompartmental knee arthroplasty using haptic robotic-assisted bone preparation an average of 13 months (6–29 months) before the study. Eleven subjects received mUKA, five subjects received mUKA+PF, and five subjects received biUKA. Subjects averaged 62 years of age and had an average body mass index of 31. Combined Knee Society Pain/Function scores averaged 102 ± 28 preoperatively and 169 ± 26 at the time of study. Knee range of motion averaged −3° to 120° preoperatively and −1° to 129° at the time of the study.
Knee motions were recorded using video-fluoroscopy while subjects performed step-up/down, kneeling and lunging activities. The three-dimensional position and orientation of the implant components were determined using model-image registration techniques (Fig. 1). The AP locations of the medial and lateral condyles were determined by computing a distance map between the femoral condyles and the tibial articular surfaces.
RESULTS
Knee kinematics during maximum flexion kneeling and lunging showed tibial internal rotation, and posterior lateral condylar translation for all three treatments (Fig. 2). All knees showed femoral external rotation and posterior condylar translation with flexion during the step activity (Fig. 3). In all three activities, knees with mUKA and mUKA+PF arthroplasty showed the most femoral external rotation and posterior translation, and knees with biUKA showed the least.
DISCUSSION
Knees with tricompartmental arthroplasty usually sacrifice one or both cruciate ligaments and also exhibit kinematics which differ from the normal knee. In particular, tibiofemoral rotations are almost always significantly less than the normal knee, and often the femur translates forward with flexion over some portion of the motion arc. In contrast, knees with accurately-placed uni- or bi-compartmental arthroplasty exhibited stable knee kinematics consistent with intact and functioning cruciate ligaments. The patterns and magnitudes of tibiofemoral motion were more similar to natural knees in the mUKA and mUKA+PF groups than commonly has been observed in knees with total knee arthroplasty. These results demonstrate the potential to restore or maintain closer-to-normal knee kinematics by retaining intact structures and compartments. Knees with an intact lateral compartment had kinematics closer to normal than those where both tibiofemoral compartments were diseased/replaced.
