Abstract
While double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction attempts to recreate the two-bundle anatomy of the native ACL, recent research also indicates that double-bundle reconstruction more closely reproduces the biomechanical properties of the ACL and restores the rotatory and sagittal stability to the level of the intact knee that was not attainable with anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Though double-bundle reconstruction provides these potential biomechanical benefits, it poses a significant challenge to the surgeon who must attempt to accurately place twice as many tunnels while avoiding tunnel convergence compared to single-bundle reconstruction. In addition, previous work has shown that tunnel malpositioning may cause grafts that fail to reproduce the native biomechanics of the ACL, increase graft tension in deep knee flexion, increase anterior tibial translation, and produce lower IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) scores.
We hypothesise that experienced surgeons without the use of computer-assisted navigation will place tunnels on the tibial plateau and lateral femoral condyle that more closely emulate the locations of the native anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) ACL bundles than inexperienced surgeons with the use of computer-assisted navigation.
A novice surgeon group comprised of three medical students each performed double-bundle ACL reconstruction using passive computer-assisted navigation on a total of eleven cadaver knees. Their individual results were compared to three experienced orthopaedic surgeons each performing the identical procedure without the use of computer-assisted navigation on a total of nine cadaver knees.
There were no significant differences in placement of either the AM or PL tunnels on the tibial plateau between novice surgeons using computer-assisted navigation and experienced surgeons without the use of computer navigation. On the lateral femoral condyle, novice surgeons placed the AM and PL tunnels significantly more anterior along Blumensaat's line on average compared to experienced surgeons. Both groups placed femoral AM and PL tunnels anterior to previously described AM and PL bundle positions.
Novice surgeons utilizing computer-assisted navigation and experienced surgeons without computer assistance place the AM and PL tunnels on the tibial side with no significant difference. On the lateral femoral condyle, novice surgeons utilising computer-assisted navigation place tunnels significantly anterior along Blumensaat's line compared to experienced surgeons without the use of computer navigation.
