Abstract
Although proximal tibia vara is physiologically and pathologically observed, it is difficult to measure the varus angle accurately and reproducibly due to inaccuracy of the radiograph because of rotational and/or torsional deformities. Since tibial coronal alignment in TKA gives influence on implant longevity, intra- or extra-medurally cutting guide should be set carefully especially in cases with severe tibia vara. In this context, we measured the proximal tibial varus angle by introducing 3D-coordinate system.
Materials & Methods
Three-dimensional models of 32 tibiae (23 females, 9 males, 71.2 ± 7.8 y/o) were reconstructed from CT data of the patients undergoing CT-based navigation assisted TKA. Clinically relevant mid-sagittal plane is defined by proximal tibial antero-posterior axis and an apex of the tibial plafond. After the cross-sectional contours of the tibial canal were extracted, least-square lines were fitted to define the proximal diaphyseal and the metaphyseal anatomical axis. The proximal tibia vara was firstly investigated in terms of distribution of proximal anatomical axis exits at the joint surface. TVA1 and TVA2 were defined to be a project angle on the coronal plane between the metaphyseal tibial anatomical axis and the proximal diaphyseal anatomical axis, and that between the metaphyseal tibial anatomical axis and the tibial functional axis, respectively. The correlations of each angle with age and femoro-tibial angle (FTA) were also examined.
Results
The proximal anatomical axis exits distributed 4.3 ± 1.7 mm medially and 17.1 ± 3.4 mm anteriorly. TVA1 and TVA2 were 12.5 ± 4.5°(4.4?23.0°) and 11.8 ± 4.4° (4.4?22.0°), respectively. The correlations of FTA with TVA1 (r=0.374, p<0.05) and TVA2 (r=0.439, p<0.05) were statistically significant.
Discussion
This is the first study that analyses tibia vara in the 3D-algorythm and that investigates its correlations with FTA. In the coronal plane, proximal tibia was actually varus, and TVA varied substantially among patients and correlated with FTA. These data implicated that TVA was involved in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritic deformities, directly or indirectly. Also tibia vara should be considered while placing the instrument to cut proximal tibia to obtain optimal setting of the implant in TKA.
