header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

CAMERA SPY: AN INTRA-OPERATIVE TEACHING TOOL

Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) 13th Annual Meeting of CAOS International



Abstract

The amount of time spent in theatre by trainees is decreasing and therefore it seems crucial to fully optimis e these to enable adequate training. Trainees at the beginning of their practice, despite their exposure to surgery, cannot always take advantages of the surgical procedure they are assisting with. An obvious example of this is total hip replacement during posterior approach. Although the posterior approach and less invasive or minimally invasive approaches are certainly beneficial for patients, they are very difficult for a young trainee to comprehend, as they spend most of the time hanging onto the retractor without or rarely seeing the important anatomic steps of the procedure. Our goal was to develop a tool that would help a trainee to fully see and understand the surgical steps of total hip replacement during a posterior approach.

To enable visualisation of the operation from the senior surgeon's perspective we developed a device to film the surgery and output the video feed to a screen. The prototype used an HD Replay XD1080 camera connected to a WDHI Xenta transmitting dongle (transmitting frequency −5.8 GHz), with an onboard 6600 mAh external Li-Mh battery providing 1A of current to the system. The Replay camera was fixed to the surgeon's ventilation helmet, and took its power from the battery supplying both the fan system and the transmitting unit. The surgeon can then clip both of these items to his belt and the connecting wires and cables run up his back. The device provided a Full HD video output of the surgery from the surgeon's perspective. The receiving unit used a Xenta WHDI wireless receiver with HDMI and DVI-I/D connections allowing the video to be displayed on any screen in the operating room with these connections.

The prototype has been trialled by the senior author and was successful in allowing the direct surgeon's view of the procedure to be displayed on a screen in the theatre so that other staff involved in the operation could see it.

Although the use of virtual training, presentations and video are essential to training, surgical training still relies greatly upon surgical assistance. The introduction of an intra-operative video feedback device would enable trainees to observe the operation from a first-person perspective which could lead to a considerable reduction in the amount of training time required, as well as a better understand of the specific surgical steps in a procedure. This would be particularly use for operations where a trainee assists the surgeon from the opposite side of the operating table, for example when undergoing total hip replacement during posterior approach. We can also envision this device also being used by surgeons to monitor their trainees when operating, and perhaps to keep a record of the operations undertaken in an establishment for archiving or assessment.