Abstract
Tibial non-union causes significant morbidity and functional impairment. Circular frames are valuable tools in the treatment of non-union, however prolonged treatment often causes patients increased morbidity due to pin site problems together with personal and emotional strains.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient centred outcomes following treatment of tibial non-union in circular frame.
We identified 21 patients who had undergone treatment of tibial non-union using a circular frame. Patients were sent questionnaires utilising the Enneking scoring system and EQ-5D general health questionnaire. Fourteen patients responded. There were 3 females, mean age was 48.2 years. The average number of previous operations was 1.2. All patients went on to achieve union with a mean 10.1 months (6–20) in frame.
The mean Enneking score was 58.0% (34.3–77.1). Two patients were enthusiastic about their treatment, two liked it, three were satisfied, four accepted and would do it again while three accepted it but would not do it again.
The Euroqol questionnaire results showed that 8 patients had some difficulty with mobility, 10 had some difficulty with usual activities and 12 moderate pain. There was no significant difference in the EQ VAS score of overall health state for treated patients compared with predicted scores for an age and sex matched UK population (77.7 vs 83.1, p=0.07).
Our study shows that many patients undergoing limb salvage with circular frames for tibial non-union continue to have clinically significant symptoms, however the majority would undergo similar treatment again and we found no difference in overall health state compared with age and sex matched predicted scores. Circular frames are undoubtedly a valuable tool in the management of non-union however patients should be given realistic counselling regarding the treatment and expected outcome.
