header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Foot & Ankle

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN ANKLE ORIF: THE CASE AGAINST PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPHYLAXIS: A FIVE-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

The British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) Annual Scientific Meeting



Abstract

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major cause of morbidity, mortality and financial burden to the NHS. Acquired risk factors are well documented, including immobilisation, lower limb plaster cast and surgery. NICE guidance on VTE prophylaxis within orthopaedics currently excludes operative ankle fracture fixation (ankle ORIF).

Aims

Ascertain the local incidence of VTE; compare our local VTE rates with published data from other institutions; review guidelines, scientific literature and other hospitals policies; formulate a local policy for VTE prophylaxis.

Method

Retrospective analysis of records of all patients undergoing ankle ORIF in our hospital over a continuous 5 year period, identifying cases of VTE, individual risk factors and surgical duration.

Results

380 patients underwent ankle ORIF; 3 developed VTE; no mortality. VTE incidence 0.79% (0.26%DVT; 0.53%PE). Operative duration 88 +/− 34mins (mean +/− 1S.D); in those with VTE, duration was 35, 90&85min. There is no statistically significant difference (p=0.18) observed between our local and national VTE incidence rates. Operative duration was not a significant factor in those developing VTE. Additional risk factors were identified in one patient with VTE.

Discussion

The incidence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia is 0.5%, its associated mortality 10% (i.e. 1:2000). To prevent one fatal PE in foot & ankle surgery, 10,000 must receive VTE prophylaxis. Therefore, heparin associated mortality exceeds VTE associated mortality in foot & ankle surgery.

Conclusion

Our local VTE rates are comparable to national rates. Risk of pharmacological prophylaxis exceeds benefit; therefore routine use not justified. Individual risk should be assessed; higher risk patients may benefit.