Abstract
The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial Shaft Fractures (SPRINT) randomised 1,226 patients treated by intramedullary nailing to reamed versus unreamed groups. We aimed to determine if there was a difference in the number of patients requiring more than one reoperation between the groups.
We hypothesised there would be differences in the number of patients with more than one reoperation in the reamed versus unreamed groups and in patients with open fractures versus closed fractures.
We identified patients requiring more than one reoperation during the 12 m follow-up. We considered those that were reamed versus unreamed, open versus closed, and those with a reoperation planned post 12 m follow-up. We also compared patient and fracture characteristics.
We identified a total of 44 patients requiring two or more reoperations. No difference between the reamed and unreamed groups was found in the risk of having more than one reoperation. Patients with two or more reoperations were older (p=0.03), had a higher frequency of open fractures (p<0.001), and had higher energy mechanisms of injury (p<0.001). The first reoperation was in response to infection for 25 patients. 12 patients had additional reoperations planned after the 12 m follow-up.
A relatively small number of tibial shaft fracture patients required more than one reoperation. Further study is required to assess consequences of needing multiple reoperations in this high risk group.
