header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

A Combined Clinical and Biomechanical Look on Early Femoral Component Loosening in High Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty: What About the Cement-Bone Interface?

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

Introduction

A few follow-up studies of high flexion total knee arthoplasties report disturbingly high incidences of femoral loosening. Finite element analysis showed a high risk for early loosening at the cement-implant interface at the anterior flange. However, femoral implant fixation is depending on two interfaces: cement-implant interface and the cement-bone interface. Due to the geometry of the distal femur, a part of the cement-bone interface consists of cement-cortical bone interface. The strength of the cement-bone interface is lower than the strength of the cement-implant interface.

The research questions addressed in this study were: 1) which interface is more prone to loosening and 2) what is the effect of different surgical preparation techniques on the risk for early loosening.

Materials & methods

To achieve data for the cement-(cortical)bone interface strength and the effects of different preparation techniques on interfacial strength, human cadaver interface stress tests were performed for different preparation techniques of the bony surface and the results were implemented in a finite element (FE) model as described before. The FE model consisted of a proximal tibia and fibula, TKA components, a quadriceps and patella tendon and a non-resurfaced patella. For use in this study, the distal femur was integrated in the FE model including cohesive interface elements and a 1 mm bone cement layer. In the model, the cement-bone interface was divided into two areas, representing cortical and cancellous bone. The posterior-stabilised PFC Sigma RP-F (DePuy, J&J, USA) was incorporated in the FE knee model following the surgical procedure provided by the manufacturer. A full weight-bearing squatting cycle was simulated (ROM = 50°-155°). The interface failure index was calculated.

Results

Overall, the highest stresses were found at the proximo-medial part beneath the anterior flange of the femoral component. Highest shear stresses were found at the cement-implant interface (peak shear stress of 3.33 MPa at 150° of flexion). Highest tensile stresses were found at the cement-cortical bone interface (peak tensile stress of 1.30 MPa at 150° of flexion).

The failure index was highest at the cement-bone interface. When the total anterior flange was covering cancellous bone, 0.4% of the cement-bone interface would fail and 0% of the cement-implant interface at 145° of flexion. In the more realistic simulation of cortical bone with periost, almost 31.3% of the complete cement-bone interface would fail even within normal range of motion (<120°). This can be reduced by drilling holes through the cortex to 2.6%.

Discussion

Obviously, the FE knee model utilized in this study contains limitations which may have affected the interface stresses calculated. However, the results presented here clearly demonstrate high risk of early loosening at the cement-bone interface. This risk can be reduced by some simple preparation techniques of the cortex behind the anterior flange. Proper anterior fixation of the femoral component, and thus adequate surgical technique, is essential to reduce the risk of femoral loosening for high-flexion TKA.