header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Comparison of Bone-Implant Surface Integration and Mechanical Stability Among Three Popularly Used Cementless Surfaces

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

This study was performed to compare the mechanism of bone-implant integration and mechanical stability among three popularly used cementless implant surfaces. Plasma sprayed porous surface (TiPL), grit-blasted rough surface (TiGB), and hydroxyapatite coated implant surface (HA) were tested in a sheep model at 4 and 12 weeks. The integration patterns were investigated using histology, histomorphometry, and mechanical strength by push-out test. All three groups demonstrated early bone ongrowth on their surfaces, with much of the ongrowth resembling contact osteogenesis. TiPL group showed bone anchorage into porous coating with new bone ingrowth into the pores. HA group revealed small cracks at its coating at 12 weeks time point. Plasma sprayed porous surface also demonstrated its superior mechanical stability maybe reinforced by its bone anchorage, whearas, HA surface exhibited higher osteoconductivity with highest ongrowth rate.