header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

In Vivo Mode of Failure of Plasma Sprayed Porous, Hydroxyapatite and Grit Blasted Cementless Surfaces in a Sheep Model Study

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

Aim

Cementless prosthesis is one of the major bone-implant interface fixation methods in total joint replacement. Grit blasted surface, hydroxyapatite coated surface and plasma sprayed metallic porous coating have been popularly used. The latter has demonstrated higher bone implant mechanical stability in previous laboratory study in early and middle stages. However, question remains what the mechanism is to make it performing better and how to improve them further. This study is designed to examine the mode of failure in bone-implant interface in a sheep model.

Method

Plasma sprayed porous coated (TiPL); hydroxyapatite (HA) coated and and grit blasted (TiGB) titanium implants were examined in the study. Each type has 36 specimens. Implants were inserted into cortical bones in a press-fit fashion in a total of 22 sheep bilateral hind limbs. Specimens were retrieved at 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Push- out testing was performed to just reach ultimate failure. Failed bone-implant interface were investigated by histology and BSEM. The percentage of failure at bone-coating interface, bone itself fracture, coating itself failure, and coating-substrate dissociation were measured by BSEM.

Results

In TiPL group, failure occurred mainly at new bone itself on ingrowing new bone and adjacent bone, with 74% at 4 weeks, and 82% at 12 weeks. The percentages were significantly higher than that of the failure at bone-porous coating dissociation. Furthermore, the percentage of failure occurred at bone was also higher in TiPS group than in the other groups at both time points.

In HA group, the main proportion of failure, 69%, occurred at bone-HA dissociation at 4 weeks, higher than the 25% at bone itself fracture. 57% of failure occurred at HA-substrate dissociation at 12 weeks, which was followed by HA coating itself breakage (Figure 1). Bone itself fracture has the lowest proportion of only 4% breakage at 12 weeks. HA coating revealed micro cracks at some area although not all of them were failed.

In TiGB group, failure mainly occurred at bone-implant surface dissociation at both time points.

Conclusion

The failure mode at the HA and TiGB groups demonstrate that new bone was less likely to break, or stronger, than bone-implant surface interface at early stage, and new bone at middle stage was stronger than the other interfaces. The bone ingrowth to metallic porous coating results in that major proportion failure has to occur at bone anchorage, either at the entry level or at adjacent bone. The anchorage is the reason why TiPS has higher mechanical shear strength in previous study.

Improving bone itself remodelling or maturing process may increase the porous coated implant in vivo mechanical strength; improving HA quality and HA-substrate adhesion may enhance HA coated implant performance; and improving bone implant surface bonding may strengthen grit blasted implant mechanical stability.