header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Postoperative Balancing and Walking Improvement After Total Knee Replacement

International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA) 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) has been proven to be an effective procedure not only to eliminate pain but also to achieve better knee function. However, details improvements of balancing or walking ability have not been sufficiently elucidated yet.

Methods

25 consecutive knees of 21 patients, with medial osteoarthritis undergone TKR have been nominated in this study. All were done by a single surgeon, via mid vastus approach, using cemented PS implant with patellar resurfacing. Patients were arrowed to start full weight bearing from the next day.

Assessing walking ability, gait speed and width of a step were measured. As for balancing, “Functional Reach (FR)” which was the difference between arm's length and maximal forward reach (Duncan PW et al), “Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)” which was time while a patient rose from an arm chair, walked 3 meters, turned, walked back (Podsiadlo D et al), and sat down again, and possible period standing on one leg (one leg standing) were used. Every measurement was performed prior to the operation, and every 1-week after operation until 4-weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and then differences among means were analyzed using Bonferroni procedures. Also, the relation of improvements between ROM and each data were investigated by Pearson's correlation coefficient test.

Result

Every result showed the worst during the first week, followed by better results over time (p<0.05) (Fig. 1–3). The time point when better result than that of pre-operation could be achieved was 2 weeks in FR and one leg standing, 3 weeks in gait speed and width of a step, and 4 weeks in TUG, though statistically not significant. Each of the result was not correlated with its recovery rate of the ROM when compared at 4 weeks of time (r = 0.2–0.3). Interestingly, postoperative one leg standing period of contra-lateral leg showed improvement with similar tendency.

Discussion

In 4 weeks after operation, every result showed better function than that of prior to operation. In general, improvement in knee function after TKR is associated with muscle recovery, better ROM, and other undetectable factors. This study showed balancing ability is also assisting the knee function correlatively after TKR. Further, as far as knee function is concerned, recovery time from TKR can be regarded as about 3–4 weeks, which could be one of the predictable factors for reasonable rehabilitation and hospitalization period.