Abstract
Purpose of study
The aim is to assess the use of non-fusion instrumentation “growth rods” in early onset scoliosis (EOS).
Methods
A retrospective review of 12 consecutive patients who had undergone a growth rod procedure for EOS was performed.
Six patients had neuromuscular scoliosis, 5 had juvenile idiopathic scoliosis while one had a congenital aetiology. Growth constructs were predominately constructed from modular commercially available sets using hooks, screws and connection blocks. One VEPTR was used in a severe kyphoscoliosis. Patients returned to theatre at 6 monthly intervals for a lengthening procedure.
Patients were assessed with regards to age at presentation, age at surgery, indications for surgery, initial Cobb angle, post- operative Cobb angle, number of lengthening's done, instrumentation used, amount of spine growth achieved and complications.
Results
The average age at presentation was 3 yrs 8 months (birth – 7 years 5 months). The average Cobb angle was 55 (38–90). Age at index surgery ranged from 2yrs 9 months to 8 years 2 months. The Cobb angle after the first procedure averaged 37 (range 20–90).
The average lengthening over 51 lengthening procedures was 8 mm. Four patients have reached the end of the process and under gone a definitive fusion with pedicle screws and growth rods. Their final Cobb angle averaged 32 (26–48).
Definitive surgery was performed earlier than planned in one patient due to repetitive rod breakage. Lengthening was abandoned in one patient whose implants became septic and required removal. Two patients required revision for superior construct failure.
Conclusion
The growth rod procedure allows spinal deformity correction and control as well as on-going growth in trunk height. It is a labour intensive process with a significant incidence of complications. There is however very little choice in these patients due to concerns of fusion restricting pulmonary development.
NO DISCLOSURES
