Abstract
Demographics changes and the increasing incidence of metastatic bone disease are driving the significant issues of vertebral body (VB) fractures as an important consideration in the quality of life of the elderly. Whilst osteoporotic vertebral fractures have been widely studies both clinically and biomechanically, those fractures arising from metastatic infiltration in the spine are relatively poorly understood. Biomechanical in-vitro assessment of these structurally weaker specimens is an important methodology for gaining an understanding of the mechanics of such fractures in which a key aspect is the development of methodologies for predicting the failure load. Here we report on a method to predict the vertebral strength by combining computed tomography assessment with an engineering beam theory as an alternative to more complex finite element analyses and its verification within a laboratory scenario. Ninety-two human vertebral bodies with 3 different pathologies: osteoporosis, multiple myeloma (MM) and specimens containing cancer metastases were loaded using a define protocol and the failure loads recorded. Analysis of the resulting data demonstrated that the mean difference between predicted and experimental failure loads was 0.25kN, 0.41kN and 0.79 kN, with adjunct correlation coefficients of 0.93, 0.64 and 0.79 for osteoporotic, metastatic and MM VBs, respectively. Issues in predicting vertebral fracture arise from extra-vertebral bony formations which add to vertebral strength in osteoporotic VB but are structurally incompetent in metastatic disease. The methodology is currently used in providing better experimental design/benchmarking within in-vitro investigations together with further exploration of its utility in the clinical arena.
