Abstract
The poor outcome of large head metal on metal total hip replacements (LHMOMTHR) in the absence of abnormal wear at the articulating surfaces has focussed attention on the trunnion/taper interface. The RedLux ultra-precision 3D form profiler provides a novel indirect optical method to detect small changes in form and surface finish of the head taper as well as a quantitative assessment of wear volume. This study aimed to assess and compare qualitatively the tapers from small diameter with LHMOMTHR's. 3 groups of retrieval tapers were analysed (Group 1: 28mm CoCr heads from MOMTHRs (n=5); Group 2: Large diameter CoCr heads from LHMOMTHRs (n=5); Group 3: 28mm heads from metal on polyethylene (MOP) THRs; n=3). Clinical data on the retrievals was collated. Both bearing surfaces and head tapers were measured for wear using the Redlux profiling non contact measurement system. Measurements included taper angle and 3D surface maps. Taper angles obtained with the Redlux method were compared to those obtained using CMM measurement on 3 parts. The Redlux profiling, including imprints, was also repeated 3 times to gauge potential errors. There was no difference in mean 12/14 taper angles between groups. There was no difference in volumetric and linear wear at the bearing surface between groups. Only the LHMOMs showed transfer of pattern from the stem to the internal head taper, with clear demarcation of the contact and damaged area between head taper and stem trunnion. 3D surface mapping demonstrated wear patterns compatible with motion or deformations between taper and trunnion in the LHMOM group alone. Discussion: Differences in appearance of the taper surface between LHMOMTHRs and MOP or MOM small diameter devices highlight an area of concern and potential contributor to the mode of early failure. Further work is required to fully qualify the Redlux method capabilities.
