header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Pelvic Infix. A new technique for the stabilisation of pelvic ring fractures: a case matched comparative series

British Orthopaedic Association 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

Pelvic ring fractures usually result from significant trauma, frequently requiring operative stabilisation. The use of an anterior internal fixator (INFIX) is a new technique. This temporary construct is quick and easy to apply using pre-existing spinal implants. No reports of functional outcomes or compartive studies with existing surgical techniques exist in indexed literature.

We present a prospective comparative case matched series of 21 patients treated with pelvic INFIX. 1:1 matching was achieved to a cohort of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) based on fracture pattern. All patients with rotationally and/or vertically unstable pelvic ring fractures treated within our level 1 trauma centre were considered for inclusion. Patients were prospectively followed up with health outcome measures (SF-36, EQ-5D) and joint specific outcome scores (Oxford and Harris hip scores).

Results

No statistically significant differences in age (mean 42v38 p=0.3143), length of stay, or operative time were seen. The ISS was significantly higher in the INFIX group (32v22 p=0.0019). Mean INFIX removal was at 14 weeks.

Baseline responses were obtained on admission where feasible. Although there was no significant difference between the treatment groups, the ORIF group showed a significantly greater deterioration from the baseline than the INFIX group, suggesting INFIX better maintains pre-injury function.

29% of patients experienced LCNT palsy whilst the INFIX was in situ. 6 patients in the INFIX group experienced some form of metal work failure (3 required surgical removal), compared with 7 ORIF patients (4 required removal).

Conclusions

Pelvic INFIX achieves bony stabilisation of unstable pelvic fractures, and should be considered for rotational or vertically unstable fractures requiring operative intervention. Despite higher ISS scores, INFIX patients performance in joint specific and global health functioning scores was not significantly different from ORIF patients. We do not use INFIX for pelvic fractures with symphyseal disruption.