Abstract
Background
Patellar instability is a complex, multi-factorial disorder. Radiological assessment is regarded as an important part of the management of this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of common radiological measurements used to evaluate patellar instability.
Methods
One hundred and fifty x-rays from 51 individuals were reviewed by five reviewers: two orthopaedic trainees, a radiological trainee, a consultant radiologist and an orthopaedic physiotherapist. Radiological measurements assessed included patellar shape, sulcus angle, congruence angle, lateral patellofemoral angle (LPA), lateral patellar displacement (LPD), lateral displacement measurement (LDM), boss height, and patellar height ratios (Caton-Deschamps, Blackburne-Peel, Insall-Salvati). All assessors were provided with a summary document outlining the method of assessing each measurement. Bland-Altman analyses were adopted to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability.
Results
The results indicated generally low measurement error on intra-rater reliability assessment, particularly for LPD (within-subject variance 0.7mm to 3.7mm), LDM (0.7mm to 3.5mm) and boss height (0.4mm to 1.6mm) for all assessors. There was greater measurement error for the calculation of sulcus angle (0.7° to 10.6°), congruence angle (0.8° to 18.4°) and LPA (0.8° to 16.5°). Whilst the inter-rater reliability between assessors indicated a low mean difference for assessments of patellar height measurements (0.0° to 0.6°), there was greater variability for LPA (0.1° to 3.6°), LPD (0.2mm to 4.6mm) and LDM (0.1mm to 4.0mm), with wide 95% limits of agreement for all measurements indicated poor precision.
Conclusions
Many of the standard measurements used to assess the patellofemoral joint on plain radiographs have poor precision. Intra-rater reliability may be related to experience but it seems likely that to achieve good inter-rater reliability, specific training may be required to calibrate observers. More formal training in the technique of radiological measurement for those who were inexperienced might have improved the inter-rater reliability.
