header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

Validity of radiological measurements in shoulder replacement; a retrospective comparative study

British Orthopaedic Association 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

Background

Accurate and reproducible radiological assessment of shoulder replacement prostheses over time is important for identifying failure or to provide reassurance. A number of clearly defined radiological parameters have been described to help standardise the radiological assessment of prostheses. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted to test the reproducibility and reliability of these measurements.

Aim

The aim of this work was to test intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability in the measurement of humeral component orientation (HCO), humeral head offset (HHO), humeral head size (HHS), humeral head height (HHH), and acromiohumeral distance (AHD.)

Materials and methods

A cohort of 67 patients who had previously undergone shoulder replacement was identified. Two independent reviewers studied the same AP radiograph of each patient on two occasions, at an interval of one month.

Results

There was strong agreement for measurements of humeral head size (ICC=0.83), moderate agreement for humeral head offset (0.66), humeral head height (0.68) and acromio-humeral distance (0.66) and fair agreement for humeral component orientation (0.44).

Conclusions

Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of radiological measurements are important factors to consider when designing longitudinal or multi-centre studies of shoulder replacement prostheses.