header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

COMPARISON OF VASCULARISED AND NON-VASCULARISED BONE GRAFTS IN THE TREATMENT OF SCAPHOID NON-UNIONS

Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA)



Abstract

Purpose

Scaphoid non-unions can result in debilitating wrist problems. This study compared treatment of scaphoid non-unions using either a non vascularised (NVBG) or a vascularised bone graft (VBG).

Method

Twenty one cases of scaphoid non-unions were treated by two surgeons between 2005 and 2008 using either a NVBG from the iliac crest or a VBG from the radius based on a 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicle.

Results

Of the 21 cases only 19 were available followed up at a minimum of 3 months with 12 cases available for clinical follow-up 2–5 years postoperatively. Union was achieved in 9 of 11 cases in the VBG group and in 6 of the 8 cases in the NVBG group with no statistically significant difference in average time to union. Wrist range of motion was compared at the time of consolidation and at the follow-up showing no significant difference between the two groups. 11 patients completed the Dash-score and the Mayo-wrist-score with similar results in both groups.

Conclusion

This study could not demonstrate any significant differences in clinical and functional outcome at the time of confirmed fracture union or at a late follow-up.