header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME FOLLOWING SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATELLAR FRACTURES BY DIFFERENT MODALITIES.

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Introduction

Throughout the years treatment of patellar fractures have been held in much controversy and various treatment procedures have been described. In the literature, there are only a few studies that compare the results of the different treatment modalities.

Materials & Methods

This study reviews our experience with patellar fractures and correlates results of different treatment modalities to grade of patellar comminution and to the length of follow-up. It consists of 114 patients (71 M, 43 F, 17–76 year old: mean- 43 years), followed for 2–9 years (mean- 3.5 years). Patients were treated by P.O.P. cast for undisplaced fractures (12 Pts), and by various surgical modalities for displaced or comminuted fractures such as O.R.I.F (53 Pts), partial patellectomy (37 Pts) and total patellectomy (12 Pts). Patients were evaluated by Lisholm functional score, by objective knee tests, and radiographically.

Results

Correlation to treatment modalities showed that functional results were excellent and good in 86% of the patients following conservative treatment by P.O.P. cast, 77% treated by O.R.I.F., 75% treated by partial patellectomy and 78% treated by total patellectomy (objective results −79%, 72%, 72%, 66.66% respectively). No statistical differences were found between these groups. However, the correlation between these treatment modalities to grade of patellar comminution revealed that in two fragment fractures similar results were observed following partial patellectomy and O.R.I.F., whereas in patients with three or more fragment fractures, a significantly better outcome was observed after partial patellectomy (79% and 62% respectively). The patients with comminuted patellar fractures treated by partial patellectomy had also a better short and long-term outcome than with all other techniques.

Conclusions

Based on this study it seems that O.R.I.F. remains as the first optimal treatment in simple two parts patellar fractures, where partial patellectomy should be considered as the treatment of choice in patients with patellar fractures of three or more fragments. Total patellectomy is the optional treatment in patients with comminuted fractures.