header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

PERCUTANEOUS BALLOON KYPHOPLASTY AND VERTEBROPLASTY FOR OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY.

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis with subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures is an increasingly important disease due not only to its significant economic impact but also to the increasing age of our population. Pain reduction and stabilization are of primary importance with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.

MATERIALS & METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2009, 142 patients (32 males and 110 females), from 54 to 84 years old (mean age 67.4) were treated for 185 osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine (level of fracture at Th5 or lower), with back pain for more than 8 weeks, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more. Twenty-two patients (29 fractures) were lost at follow-up period and excluded. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous kyphoplasty (64%) or vertebroplasty (36%). All fractures were analyzed for improvement in sagittal alignment (Cobb angle, kyphotic angle, sagittal index, vertebral height). The patients were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Score. Radiographs were performed postoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The score according to pain, the patient's ability to ambulate independently and without difficulty, and the need for medications improved significantly (P < 0.001) after kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty. No significant difference could be found between both groups for the mean VAS and ODI preoperative and postoperative. Vertebral body height and kyphotic wedge angle of the T-L spine were also improved (p < 0.001); although kyphosis correction seems to be improved better in kyphoplasty than vertebroplasty. The rate of leakage was 12% for kyphoplasty and 32% for vertebroplasty; nevertheless most of the leakage was clinically asymptomatic and the rate of serious problems remained low (pulmonary embolism 0.01% kyphoplasty vs 0.6% vertebroplasty). New fractures in the next 6 months at the adjacent vertebrae were observed ∼ 15% in both groups. More PMMA was used in the kyphoplasty group than in the vertebroplasty group (5.5 +/− 0.8 vs. 4.1 +/− 0.5 mL, p < 0.001). Operation time was longer in balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty (mean time 20±5min/vertebral fracture in group B vs 30±5min in group A).

CONCLUSION

Both balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty provided a safe and effective treatment for pain and disability in patients with vertebral compression fractures due to trauma or osteoporosis. Balloon kyphoplasty led to an ongoing reduction of fractured vertebrae and was followed by a lower rate of cement leakage.