header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LATERAL RETINACULUM AFTER FAILED LATERAL RELEASE IN CASE OF PATELLOFEMORAL INSTABILITY – A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Objectives

For a long time lateral release (LR) was performed as a standard procedure both, for patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and patellofemoral instability (PFI). However, recent biomechanical studies have shown that LR is not useful for decreasing the lateral force onto the patella, but is increasing not only medial but also lateral PFI. Furthermore, pain on palpation over the lateral patellofemoral joint space can result in patients treated with extensive LR. We postulate that in case of persistent PFI or PFPS after failed LR the reconstruction of the lateral retinaculum as an addition of the reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is necessary in terms of decreasing medial PFI as well as lateral pain.

Materials and Methods

In between 03/07 and 04/09 we have seen a total of 25 patients (20 f, 5 m) with persistent PFI and palpatory pain over the lateral retinaculum due to unsuccessful treatment of PFI with a LR. These patients have undergone revision surgery with an anatomical reconstruction of the released lateral retinaculum in combination with a reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in an aperture-technique using the gracilis tendon. The average age at time of operation was 26.2 ± 9.8 years. Preoperatively, as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, clinical examinations were performed and subjective as well as objective scores (Kujala-, Tegner-, IKDC-score) were evaluated. Regarding radiological parameters measurement of patellar tilt and shift was carried out on axial radiographs before and after the operation.

Results

During the first twelve months after the operation only one redislocation could be recorded. Pain on palpation over the reconstructed lateral retinaculum was remaining in four patients (16%). Although several patients complained about persistent patellofemoral pain on exertion or after enduring flexion of the knee, all of them reported about an improvement of their pain situation. This fact is reflected in a highly significant improved but still moderate IKDC- (from 46.5 ± 14.9 to 68.9 ± 22.7, p<0.001) and Kujala-score (from 47.7 ± 15.3 to 74.8 ± 24.8, p<0.001) at the one year follow up. As far as sports activity is concerned, a statistically significant improvement of the Tegner-score up to 4.7 ± 2.4 (preoperative 2.3 ± 1.5, p<0.001) could be achieved. The radiological analysis showed a highly significant decrease of both, patellar tilt (from 15.4 ± 6.5 to 10.3 ± 6.2, p<0.001) and patellar shift (from 4.3 ± 3.3 to 2.5 ± 1.3, p=0.002).

Conclusions

After one or more unsuccessful previous efforts of stabilizing the patella by LR, the technique performed in this essay leads to a considerable improvement of subjective scores and objective clinical and radiological parameters as well as sports activity.