header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

COMPARING OSTEOPOROSIS RATES, PAST SCREENING AND MANAGEMENT IN BRAZILIAN MALES VERSUS FEMALES REFERRED FOR BONE MINERAL DENSITY SCANNING

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Background

Though less common than in females, osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures are not uncommon in males. Our primary objectives were (1) to compare the rates of osteoporosis and osteopenia in adult Brazilian males versus females, 55 years old and over and presenting for bone mineral densitometry (BMD); and (2) to compare males and females as to past osteoporosis screening and management.

Methods

From our clinic population, we prospectively surveyed 343 males and 493 females, all at least 55 years of age, who had presented for BMD testing, to identify baseline demographic and clinical characteristics; risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures; overall osteoporosis and 10-year fracture risk; and evidence of prior assessment for and/or management/prevention of osteoporosis. Final osteoporosis risk was determined using the results of BMD testing and the FRAX® tool. Gender comparisons were performed using Pearson 2 analysis for nominal and ordinal variables, Student's t-tests for normally-distributed continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally-distributed continuous variables, with all tests 2-tailed and p=0.05 set as the threshold for statistical significance. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of prior hormonal treatment and BMD.

Results

There were no differences in the rates of prior fracture, spinal fracture or long-bone fracture between the sexes, though women were more likely to have osteoporosis of the spine and femur, and had higher estimated risks of future osteoporotic fracture (all p < 0.001). Women also were significantly more likely to have received treatment for their osteoporosis (7.9 vs. 3.1%, p=0.004) and to have had prior BMD testing (80.7 vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). Ten-year probabilities of hip fracture were 4.8% in males and 5.2% in females; and for a major osteoporotic fracture 5.6% and 24.3%., respectively (both p < 0.001). Age, gender and spinal osteoporosis predicted prior hormonal treatment; but gender was the only predictor of prior BMD, with males 95% less likely to have undergone prior testing than females.

Conclusions

Despite similar past fracture rates, and lower but still appreciable future fracture risk, far fewer males than females had received prior screening or management of their osteoporosis.