header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

VARIATIONS IN ACETABULAR CUP POSITIONING IN A MULTICENTER CLINICAL STUDY

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Introduction

Proper cup positioning is a critical component in the success of total hip arthroplasty surgery. A multicenter study has been initiated to study a new type of highly cross-linked polyethylene. This study provides a unique opportunity to a review the acetabular cup placement of over 500 patients implanted in the past 2 years from 13 medical centers from the U.S., Mexico, and Europe.

Methods

482 patients have received primary total hip arthroplasty using components from a single manufacturer in 5 centers in the US and Mexico and 7 centers in Europe. The acetabular anteversion and inclination were measured in post-operative radiographs. An acceptable window of cup position is defined at 5–25° of anteversion and 30–45° of inclination.

Results

The measured cup anteversion and inclination averaged 15.89° ± 8.91° (0.00–42.25°) and 43.27° ± 7.17° (23.46–67.79°), respectively. Of the patient radiographs read, 71% were within the acceptable range of anteversion, 55% were in the acceptable range of inclination, and 41% satisfied both criteria. The best performing center had 86% of patients within the acceptable range of anteversion, 63% in the acceptable range of inclination, and 57% satisfied both criteria. The worst performing center had 54% within the acceptable range of anteversion, 29% in the acceptable range of inclination, and 17% satisfied both criteria.

Conclusion

A significant variation in acetabular cup anteversion and inclination exists in this study both within and between the participating high volume centers. Correlation to mid- and long-term clinical outcome will show the clinical relevance of the finding, but liner designs with unsupported polyethylene should be used with caution.