header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

HIP ABDUCTOR RE-ATTACHMENT AUDITED USING A WIRE MARKER

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Introduction

Direct lateral approaches to the hip require detachment and repair of the anterior part of the gluteus medius and minimus tendon attachments. Limping may occur postoperatively due to nerve injury or failure of muscle re-attachment. The aim of this study was to assess the integrity of abductor muscle repairs using a braided wire suture marker.

Methods

Total hip arthroplasties were inserted using a modified Freeman approach. After repair of the abductor tendons using a 1 PDS suture with interlocking Kessler stitches, a 3–0 braided wire suture marker was stitched into the lower end of the flap. The suture was easily visible on postoperative radiographs and its movement could be measured. Patients were assessed using radiographs and Oxford hip scores collected prospectively.

Results

56 joint replacements were performed in 51 patients with no major surgical complications. Mean age was 65 yr and 80% (n=41) were female. It proved possible to reproducibly classify repairs based on radiographic measurements as: no wire movement (43%); repair stretched, moving cephalad a short distance (46%); repair detached, moving cephalad a significant distance (11%). Risk of failure of the repair had no relationship with age, preoperative Oxford hip score, or postoperative Oxford hip score. The mean Oxford hip score drop in the no movement group was 36%, the stretched group 37%, and the detached group 33%. These differences were not significant.

Discussion/Conclusion

The wire marker proved to be a revealing method of auditing abductor repair following hip arthroplasty. No difference was demonstrated in outcome in relation to wire movement, therefore this study did not show any advantage from a careful repair technique. Due to the small number of failed repairs there may be a type II error. This method may also be useful in assessing the integrity of other large tendon repairs, such as quadriceps tendons splits in total knee replacements.