header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

VOLUMETRIC WEAR ASSESSMENT OF FAILED METAL-ON-METAL HIP RESURFACING PROSTHESES

British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS)



Abstract

Wear debris induced osteolysis is a recognized complication in conventional metal-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty. One method of achieving wear reduction is through the use of metal-on-metal articulations. One of the latest manifestations of this biomaterial combination is in designs of hip resurfacing which are aimed at younger, more active patients. But, do these metal-on-metal hip resurfacings show low wear when implanted into patients?

Using a Mitutoyo Legex 322 co-ordinate measuring machine (scanning accuracy less than 1 micron) and a bespoke computer program, volumetric wear measurements for retrieved Articular Surface Replacements (ASR, DePuy) metal-on-metal hip resurfacings were undertaken. Measurements were validated against gravimetric calculations for volumetric wear using a sample femoral head that was artificially worn in vitro. At 5mm3, 10mm3, and 15mm3 of material removal, the method was shown to be accurate to within 0.5mm3.

Thirty-two femoral heads and twenty-two acetabular cups were measured. Acetabular cups exhibited mean volumetric wear of 29.00mm3 (range 1.35 - 109.72mm3) and a wear rate of 11.02mm3/year (range 0.30 - 63.59mm3/year). Femoral heads exhibited mean wear of 22.41mm3 (range 0.72 - 134.22mm3) and a wear rate of 8.72mm3/year (range 0.21 - 31.91mm3/year). In the 22 cases where both head and cup from the same prosthesis were available, mean total wear rates of 21.66mm3/year (range 0.51 - 95.50mm3/year) were observed.

Revision was necessitated by one of five effects; early femoral neck fracture (4 heads), avascular necrosis (AVN) (2 heads, 1 cup), infection (1 head, 1 cup), adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) (19 heads, 18 cups) or ARMD fracture (6 heads, 2 cups). Mean paired wear rates for the AVN and infection retrievals were 0.51mm3/year and 3.98mm3/year respectively. In vitro tests typically offer wear rates for metal-on-metal devices in the region of 2-4mm3.

Mean paired wear rates for ARMD and ARMD fracture were 17.64mm3/year and 68.5mm3/year respectively, significantly greater than those expected from in vitro tests. In the 4 cases of early fracture, only the heads were revised so a combined wear rate calculation was not possible. The heads exhibited mean wear rate of 8.26mm3/year. These high wear rates are of concern.