AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT

M Newton Ede; E R S Ross; B Rischke; B Joellenbeck; J Hipp; K Zimmers

doi:10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Article alerts Social media

Current issue

Spine

AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT

British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS)

M Newton Ede
E R S Ross
B Rischke
B Joellenbeck
J Hipp
K Zimmers

AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT

Newton Ede M, Ross ERS, Rischke B, Joellenbeck B, Hipp J, Zimmers K. AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT. Orthop Procs. 2012;94-B(SUPP_XXVI):11-11. doi:10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Newton Ede, M, et al. “AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT.” Orthopaedic Proceedings, vol. 94-B, no. SUPP_XXVI, 2012, pp. 11-11., https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Newton Ede, M., Ross, E. R. S., Rischke, B., Joellenbeck, B., Hipp, J., & Zimmers, K. (2012). AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT. Orthopaedic Proceedings, 94-B(SUPP_XXVI), 11-11. https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Newton Ede, M., Ross, E. R. S., Rischke, B., Joellenbeck, B., Hipp, J. and Zimmers, K. (2012) “AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT.” Orthopaedic Proceedings, 94-B(SUPP_XXVI), pp. 11-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Newton Ede, M, E R S Ross, B Rischke, B Joellenbeck, J Hipp, and K Zimmers. “AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT.” Orthopaedic Proceedings 94-B, no. SUPP_XXVI (2012): 11-11. https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Newton Ede M, Ross ERS, Rischke B, Joellenbeck B, Hipp J, Zimmers K. AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE CENTER OF ROTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS IMPLANTED WITH A VISCOELASTIC TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT. Orthop Procs. 2012 Jun 1;94-B(SUPP_XXVI):11-11. https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXVI.BASS2011-011

Copy to clipboard

BibTeX

EndNote

RIS

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if clinical outcomes are correlated with center of rotation (COR) in patients implanted with a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR).

Methods

Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar DDD between L4 and S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial of a VTDR across three surgical centres. A comprehensive, independent review and statistical analysis of both clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed and analyzed for correlations. Data from preoperative through 2 years were available. The COR was calculated for the index levels and compared to data for an asymptomatic population. Each COR coordinate was classified as abnormal if outside of the 95% confidence interval for an asymptomatic population.

Results

At most recent follow-up, 69% of the patients had achieved at least a 15 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement. 76% of the patients achieved at least a 10 point improvement. At most recent follow-up, 78% of cases had a normal COR-X and 92% had a normal COR-Y. Results from three statistical tests show the association between COR-X and outcomes. 1) Based on latest available time point for each patient, the improvement in ODI score was significantly better for patients with a normal anterior-posterior (AP) coordinate of the COR (P=0.03). 2) Anterior COR corresponded with anterior placement of the device in the disc space, and patients were almost 7 times less likely to achieve at least a 15 point improvement in the ODI score if the COR was positioned too anteriorly. 3) This effect was also seen in the average AP coordinate of the COR for patients who achieved a 15 point ODI improvement.

Conclusions

A viscoelastic TDR can restore a normal COR. This is the first study to show that restoration of a normal COR correlates with a significant and clinically relevant improvement in patient disability.